How to test a 1.5 pound magnesium anode

AI Thread Summary
Testing a 1.5-pound magnesium anode for grounding tracer wire involves understanding its conductivity and signal strength compared to a smaller anode. There are no established standards specifically for tracer wire grounding, which complicates testing methods. Conductivity is influenced more by the shape and surface area of the anode rather than just its weight, with deeper placement in moist soil enhancing performance. Ground resistance testers are recommended for evaluating grounding effectiveness, and larger anodes may provide better corrosion protection and longevity. Overall, the relationship between anode size and conductivity requires further investigation to determine optimal performance.
Mike Moore
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello my name is Mike Moore and I work for Copperhead Industries, LLC We are a tracer wire manufacture for the underground non-metallic pipe utility sector, natural gas, water, sewer and telecom. We use magnesium anodes for grounding out the far end of the tracer wire system which completes the electrical circuit needed to carry the tracer wire signal.

My question, I need to know where or how you can test a 1.5 pound magnesium anode that's used for grounding of tracer wire and not cathodic protection. What I'm trying to find is would a 1.5 # verses a 1/2 # perform better in conductivity or signal strength. I know bigger anodes are better in corrosion protection, but does it matter in conductivity? Does distance of a tracer wire locate signal get stronger with larger anode or does size not matter when it comes to grounding and conductivity? My thought would be the longer the anode the more surface we contact the better the ground. Would a larger anode last longer?

Thanks for any guidance or answers!

Thanks,
Mike
North American Sales Manager
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Mike Moore said:
Hello my name is Mike Moore and I work for Copperhead Industries, LLC We are a tracer wire manufacture for the underground non-metallic pipe utility sector, natural gas, water, sewer and telecom. We use magnesium anodes for grounding out the far end of the tracer wire system which completes the electrical circuit needed to carry the tracer wire signal.

My question, I need to know where or how you can test a 1.5 pound magnesium anode that's used for grounding of tracer wire and not cathodic protection. What I'm trying to find is would a 1.5 # verses a 1/2 # perform better in conductivity or signal strength. I know bigger anodes are better in corrosion protection, but does it matter in conductivity? Does distance of a tracer wire locate signal get stronger with larger anode or does size not matter when it comes to grounding and conductivity? My thought would be the longer the anode the more surface we contact the better the ground. Would a larger anode last longer?

Thanks for any guidance or answers!

Thanks,
Mike
North American Sales Manager

Hi Mike, and Welcome to the PF.

What professional/regulatory standards apply? It sounds like there should be some standards that would need to be tested to, no?
 
No there is no standard for grounding of tracer wire, but it is starting to get traction across North America. The problem for us is finding a way to test the conductivity. To understand tracer wire a little more go to www.mrwa.com and scroll down middle of page and click on tracer wire spec/ installation guide. What is the difference in cudutivity from heavy long skinny anode to fat short anode? Does greater/ more Earth surface contact make greater conductivity? Would a 1.5# anode 16" lomg be better then 1/2# 6" long? Thanks for input! - Mike
 
Wouldn't the conductivity depend much more on the shape and surface area than the weight?
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
I work as an electrician and we use a "ground resistance tester" when we have questions of a ground being adequate.
Our unit is a fluke, but almost any quality tester manufacturer makes them. A little pricey ($1400 and up ), but indispensable
when evaluating an installation. You can set up a test with differing length rod next to each other and see where the point is where more
rod doesn't give you any less resistance.
In electrical a minimum 6' in contact with soil(90 degree angle to the ground) is required, but ground rods (copper or galvanized steel) come in 8' minimum( so you can drive them at up to 45 degrees to the ground).
Just google ground resistance tester.
 
anorlunda said:
Wouldn't the conductivity depend much more on the shape and surface area than the weight?

You are absolutely correct. The deeper it reaches down into the moist soil, and the more "salts" in the soil, the better the ground.
If we test a ground installation and it is not low enough resistance there is a method of lowering it using salts. Don't have to do that very often though.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top