How to use Beer-Lampert law without knowing pathlength?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rawr18
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenges faced when using ATR-IR spectroscopy to determine the concentration of a sample without knowing the pathlength, which is essential for applying Beer's Law. The user expresses confusion over calculating the incident angle, ATR crystal refractive index, and sample refractive index necessary for determining penetration depth. Suggestions include constructing a calibration curve using absorbance data from known concentrations, although this requires prior collection of absorbance data for different concentrations. If no such data exists, creating a calibration curve post-analysis is not feasible. Additionally, using the refractive index of the solvent for diluted samples is recommended. The conversation also touches on basic forum functionalities, such as quoting previous messages.
rawr18
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So I did an experiment today using ATR-IR spectroscopy, thus I didn't know what the exact pathlength was (I should have just used traditional FT-IR!). Anyhow, I know that Beer's Law states that:

A(Absorbance)= a(wavelength) * b (pathlength) * c (concentration)

I know absorbance and wavelength, and am trying to find the concentration of my sample. However, I have no idea what the pathlength was since I used ATR. I looked up a formula online for penetration depth (which may be interchangeable with pathlength, not really sure), and it read:

dp= λ / 2(π)(n1) sqrt(sin^2θ - (n2/n1)^2)

I'm just confused as how to find the incident angle, ATR crystal refractive index and sample refractive index?

Any help would be much appreciated! thanks.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Without the path length the Beer-Lambert law is redundant. One way round your problem would be to construct a calibration curve for your substance vs absorbance and then simply read off your concentration at the appropriate absorption
 
Thanks Text, is there a way to create a calibration curve AFTER the analyses have been done? I already have my data in the form of FT-IR graphs, how can I create a calibration curve?
 
rawr18 said:
is there a way to create a calibration curve AFTER the analyses have been done

If you have not recorded signals for different concentrations - no. If you did - it is not different from calibration curve for any other type of measurement.
 
Thanks Text, is there a way to create a calibration curve AFTER the analyses have been done? I already have my data in the form of FT-IR graphs, how can I create a calibration curve?

Make solutions with a range of concentrations which include your estimated value and measure their absorbances. Then plot concentration vs absorbance.
 
Maybe you can use some absorption of your solvent for calibration?
 
rawr18 said:
I'm just confused as how to find the incident angle, ATR crystal refractive index and sample refractive index?


For the first two, RTFM of the instrument. For the latter one, if your substance is diluted, you can probably use the index of the pure solvent (in the IR, of course).
 
Here's a dopy question - how do you get to display the originally posted questions when answering?
 
Hang on! I think I may have it! You just click "quote" right?
 
  • #10
tex43 said:
Hang on! I think I may have it! You just click "quote" right?

Yes.
 
Back
Top