How to work out vacuum in in.hg

  • Thread starter Thread starter deathlucky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vacuum Work
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the amount of air in bottles with varying vacuums measured in inches of mercury (in.hg), one can use the density ratios relative to atmospheric pressure, which is approximately 30 in.hg at sea level. For bottles with vacuums of 10 in.hg, 20 in.hg, and 30 in.hg, the air volume can be determined by comparing each vacuum level to the atmospheric pressure. The discussion emphasizes using these ratios to find the air density in each bottle. Understanding these calculations is crucial for accurate measurements in vacuum applications. This method provides a straightforward approach to quantify air content in vacuum conditions.
deathlucky
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
im just wondering to work out vacuum in in.hg say if i have 3 1 letter bottles they have vacuums of 10 in.hg 20 in.hg 30 in.hg how much air will be in the bottles

cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just ratio the densities to the density at atmospheric pressure.
 
ok but what is the ratio
 
Atmospheric pressure at sea level is around 30 inches of mercury
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top