How to Write Net Ionic Equations for Dissolution Reactions

  • Thread starter Thread starter yellowduck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ionic Net
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on writing net ionic equations for dissolution reactions involving NaOH and HCl. For the dissolution of solid NaOH in water, the net ionic equation is NaOH (s) → Na+ (aq) + OH- (aq), while for the reaction between aqueous NaOH and HCl, it simplifies to OH- (aq) + H+ (aq) → H2O (l). When combining the equations, the solid state of NaOH must be retained in the net ionic equation, leading to NaOH (s) + H+ (aq) → Na+ (aq) + H2O (l). Participants clarify that the presence of solid NaOH necessitates writing the complete formula, even in the net ionic equation. The final consensus confirms that the approach to writing these equations is correct, emphasizing the importance of state symbols in reactions.
yellowduck
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
This should be easy but I feel there is something I am mission

I need to write the net ionic equations and then add #1 & #2 and compare to #3.

Equation #1 - write net ionic equation for dissolution of solid NaOH in water
Equation: NaOH (s) + H2O --> Na+ (aq) + OH- (aq) + H2O (l)
Net: NaOH (s) --> Na+ (aq) + OH- (aq)
(it says in the book to separate strong bases such as NaOH but if I do all ions cancel out?)

Equation #2 - write net ionic equation for aqueous soloutions of NaOH & HCl
Equation: NaOH (aq) + HCl (aq) ---> NaCl (aq) + H2O (l)
Net: OH- (aq) + H+ (aq) --> H2O (l)

Equation 3: Solid NaOH and aqueous HCl
Equation: NaOH (s) + HCl (aq) ---> NaCl (aq) + H2O
OH- (s) + H+ (aq) --> H2O (l)

Add #1 & #2
This is where I get lost. I think it should be net equation #2. The difference is in the solid/aqueous state.

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Add #1 to #2.

NaOH \text{(s)} + OH^- \text{(aq)} + H^+ \text{(aq)} \longrightarrow Na^+ \text{(aq)} + OH^- \text{(aq)} + H_2O \text{(l)}

2. Delete the common compounds on both members of the equation.

NaOH \text{(s)} + H^+ \text{(aq)} \longrightarrow Na^+ \text{(aq)} + H_2O \text{(l)}
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is it possible that I have equation #3 wrong.
Should the net ionic equation look like your final answer above?
 
yellowduck said:
Is it possible that I have equation #3 wrong.
Should the net ionic equation look like your final answer above?

You have #3 correct, I think.

:approve: :wink:
 
Solid NaOH in HCl-solution. The HCl-solution contains H^{+} and Cl^{-} but the solid is just NAOH. So the reaction at 3 should be:

NaOH(s) + H^{+} \rightarrow Na^{+} + H_{2}O
 
So if it states solid, then you must write out the entire formula even in the net ionic equation (because it is infered that the solid is not dissolved in the solution)?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top