How Were Nuclear Detonation Triggers Designed to Prevent Accidental Explosions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fanieh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Detonation
AI Thread Summary
The documentary "Trinity and Beyond" highlights over 300 nuclear tests conducted between 1945 and 1970, raising questions about the safety mechanisms preventing accidental detonations. The triggering devices used for these nuclear explosions relied on a complex system of cables and a critical switch called a krytron, which ensured simultaneous activation of all detonators. Such systems are designed with interlocks to prevent accidental activation, similar to safety measures in rocket launching and demolition practices. In mining and excavation, explosives are only connected to firing devices once personnel are at a safe distance. Overall, the meticulous design and safety protocols in place were key to avoiding accidental detonations during these tests.
fanieh
Messages
274
Reaction score
12
I just watched the documentary Trinity and Beyond where it showed footages of nuclear detonations. There were over 300 such tests between 1945 and 1970. Why didn't any accidental nuclear detonations occur in those tests. What kind of triggering device did they use to make the nukes explode? I don't think it is simply touching two wires together. But in those times.. there were no computer codes either. So how did the triggering button or signal work?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The challenge in any implosion design is to get all elements to go off simultaneously. If they don't, things fizzle.
If you look further, there are photos of the Trinity device festooned in cables prior to detonation. Those cables were to provide power to each detonator concurrently. There is an essential switch, called a krytron, which ensures simultaneous power to all.
 
fanieh said:
Why didn't any accidental nuclear detonations occur in those tests.
Such complex systems, including rocket launching systems, have sets of interlocks to prevent accidental activation.
 
any illustration or schematics of this interlock? this can also be applied to dynamites in mountains...
 
fanieh said:
any illustration or schematics of this interlock?
No.
fanieh said:
this can also be applied to dynamites in mountains...
In mining or excavation, charges are set, but are not attached to firing device until everyone is safely clear of the area. Same in demolition. The devices are well-known to the practitioners in their respective industries.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
36
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Back
Top