How will the equation for gravitational force be changed?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the mathematical proof of the gravitational force equation as distance increases. Participants clarify that as distance (d) becomes much larger than length (L), the ratio L/d approaches zero, leading to the simplification of the gravitational force equation to F ≈ GmM/d². One user initially misunderstands the mathematical reasoning but eventually arrives at the correct proof by manipulating the equation. The conversation highlights the importance of using limits correctly in mathematical proofs. Learning to use LaTeX is also suggested to improve clarity in presenting mathematical work.
Edel Crine
Messages
89
Reaction score
12
Homework Statement
There is a gravitational force between a particle and a uniform rod.
m is a mass of particle, M is a mass and L is a length of the rod. d is the distance between the head of the rod and particle.
If the d>>L, how does the equation for the gravitational force of the rod to a particle will be changed?
Relevant Equations
F = GmM/d(d+L)
At first, I thought when the rod goes really far away from the particle, then L would approach to zero in a particle's reference view. As a result, the equation will be GmM/d^2. However, I just thought that L just remain as it is regardless of change in d, but not sure...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct but for the wrong reason. What you are saying might have some intuitive sense but it is mathematically incorrect or inaccurate. What really happens is that when d becomes very large in comparison to L then the ratio ##\frac{L}{d}## tends to zero.

How can you take advantage that for ##d>>L## it will be ##\frac{L}{d}\approx 0## to prove mathematically that the force will tend to ##F\approx G\frac{mM}{d^2}##?
 
  • Like
Likes Edel Crine
Delta2 said:
You are correct but for the wrong reason. What you are saying might have some intuitive sense but it is mathematically incorrect or inaccurate. What really happens is that when d becomes very large in comparison to L then the ratio ##\frac{L}{d}## tends to zero.

How can you take advantage that for ##d>>L## it will be ##\frac{L}{d}\approx 0## to prove mathematically that the force will tend to ##F\approx G\frac{mM}{d^2}##?
Ummmm... using limit...?
lim d->∞ (L/d) = L/∞ = 0...?
 
You are just using limits to prove that $$lim_{d \to +\infty}\frac{L}{d}=0$$ which is fine but I didn't ask you to do this. Essentially I asked you to prove that $$\lim_{\frac{L}{d} \to 0}G\frac{mM}{d(d+L)}=G\frac{mM}{d^2}$$
 
  • Like
Likes Edel Crine
Delta2 said:
You are just using limits to prove that $$lim_{d \to +\infty}\frac{L}{d}=0$$ which is fine but I didn't ask you to do this. Essentially I asked you to prove that $$\lim_{\frac{L}{d} \to 0}G\frac{mM}{d(d+L)}=G\frac{mM}{d^2}$$
I'm so sorry... little stuck...
 
Delta2 said:
You are just using limits to prove that $$lim_{d \to +\infty}\frac{L}{d}=0$$ which is fine but I didn't ask you to do this. Essentially I asked you to prove that $$\lim_{\frac{L}{d} \to 0}G\frac{mM}{d(d+L)}=G\frac{mM}{d^2}$$
Oh, if I divide both numerator and denominator by d^2, then
(GmM/d^2)*(1/(1+L/d))
=GmM/d^2)*(1/(1+0))
=(GmM/d^2)*1
=GmM/d^2
?
 
Well now you have essentially proven it correctly :D.

You just have to learn to use ##LATEX## though :D
 
  • Like
Likes Edel Crine
Delta2 said:
Well now you have essentially proven it correctly :D.

You just have to learn to use ##LATEX## though :D
I really appreciate! That makes a lot more sense to me! Yes, learning LATEX would be much easier to show my works... Anyway, you have a great day!
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Back
Top