How Would a U-Boat Captain Calculate the Angle to Fire a Torpedo at a Tanker?

  • Thread starter Thread starter george01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trajectories
george01
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Say in World War II a u-boat captain is trying to sink a tanker. He knows the distance to the tanker, its speed and heading (which are assumed to be constant) and the speed of the u-boats torpedos. How would he calculate what angle to fire the torpedo to hit the tanker?? (Assuming the u-boat firing calculator thing was broken and everyone else on board was busy)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Sounds pretty straight forward to me. Let's assume you set up a coordinate system so that the u-boat is at (0,0) and, at t=0, the tanker is on the x-axis moving parallel to the positive y-axis. If its speed is v, and distance is d, then its position at time t is (d, vt). Since the torpedo's path will be a straight line passing through (0,0), it can be written y= mx where m is the slope (tangent of the angle). But we need that in terms of t: Okay, if x= at, then y= mat and the distance along the line from the u-boat (0,0) to the torpedo is (by Pythagorean theorem) \sqrt{a^2t^2+ m^2a^2t^2}= at\sqrt{1+ m^2}. If the torpedo's speed is u, then we have ut= at\sqrt{1+ m^2} so
a= \frac{u}{\sqrt{1+ m^2}}.

The torpedo will cover the horizontal (x-direction) distance d when
at= \frac{ut}{\sqrt{1+ m^2}}= d
In otherwords, when
t= \frac{d\sqrt{1+ m^2}}{u}
The y- component at that time, y= mx= md must be equal to the distance the tanker has traveled,
vt= \frac{vd\sqrt{1+ m^2}}{u}= md[/itex]<br /> That gives<br /> \sqrt{1+ m^2}= \frac{mu}{v}<br /> Squaring both sides,<br /> 1+ m^2= \frac{m^2u^2}{v^} <br /> so <br /> 1= \left(\frac{u^2}{v^2}-1\right)m^2<br /> = \frac{u^2- v^2}{v^2}m^2<br /> m^2= \frac{v^2}{u^2- v^2}<br /> m= \frac{v}{\sqrt{u^2- v^2}}<br /> so in terms of the angle:<br /> \theta= arctan(\frac{v}{\sqrt{u^2- v^2}}<br /> You can see why the torpedo had better be faster than the tanker!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top