How would you have done this Coulomb's law problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1MileCrash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coulomb's law Law
AI Thread Summary
To solve the Coulomb's law problem involving three charged particles, the net electrostatic force on particle 3 must be zero, which requires it to be positioned to the left of particle 1 due to the stronger negative charge of particle 2. The calculations show that the y-coordinate of particle 3 is zero, allowing for the cancellation of forces in the y-direction. The derived x-coordinate for particle 3 is approximately -13.66, aligning closely with the book's answer of -14. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding vector directions and magnitudes in electrostatic problems. Overall, the method used to find the coordinates is validated, and the reasoning behind the y-component being zero is clarified.
1MileCrash
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
41

Homework Statement



In the figure, particle 1 of charge 1.0 micro Coulombs and particle 2 of charge -3.0 micro Coulombs are held at a separation of L = 10.0 cm. If particle 3, of unknown charge is to be located such that the net electrostatic force on it is 0, what must its x and y coordinates be?

(figure)

1<------L------->2

with 1 at the origin.


Homework Equations



Coulomb's law

The Attempt at a Solution



First, I noted that the particle must be to the left of 1 because 2 is of stronger net charge, so it must be closer to 1 and further from 2.

Furthermore, since the sum of the two forces is 0, they must be equal in magnitude and opposite in sign.

kq_{1}q_{3}r^{-2}_{1}\widehat{r}_{1} = - kq_{2}q_{3}r^{-2}_{2}\widehat{r}_{2}

q_{1}r^{-2}_{1}\widehat{r}_{1} = - q_{2}r^{-2}_{2}\widehat{r}_{2}

I was stumped here until I cheated and looked at the y coordinate answer. It is 0. Only knowing that was I able to solve. Can someone tell me why that is the case?


Since I know the y coordinate is 0, the vectors on both is -i, allowing me to cancel them out.


q_{1}r^{-2}_{1} = - q_{2}r^{-2}_{2}

(1x10^{-6})r^{-2}_{1} = (3x10^{-6})r^{-2}_{2}

r^{-2}_{1} = 3r^{-2}_{2}

r^{2}_{2} = 3r^{2}_{1}

r_{2} = \sqrt{3}r_{1}

I also know that r2 is 10 greater than r1.

r_{2} = 10 + r_{1}

Substituting that for r2 in the first equation,

r1 = 13.66.

Since I know it's to the left of r1, and r1 is on the origin, the x coordinate must be -13.66.

The answer in the book is -14, so I'm reasonably confident.

However, I want to know:

1.) Is this how you would have done it?
2.) Why is the y component 0?
3.) Is the y component known to be 0 through working the problem, or from examining the layout of the particles?

TY
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: Can two non-parallel vectors cancel?
 
Nope, I see. Thanks.

does the rest look ok?
 
I didn't check your arithmetic, but your method is perfectly correct.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top