How would you prepare a 500 ml lab stock of:

  • Thread starter Thread starter jKotha
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lab Prepare
AI Thread Summary
To prepare a 500 ml stock solution of 20% (w/v) SDS, you need to understand that "w/v" refers to grams of solute per 100 ml of solution. For a 20% solution, this means you require 20 grams of SDS for every 100 ml of solution. Therefore, for 500 ml, you would need 100 grams of SDS (20 g x 5). The calculation of 0.1 g SDS for 500 ml is incorrect; the correct amount is 100 grams. Understanding the definition of w/v is crucial for accurate preparation.
jKotha
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How would you prepare a 500 ml lab stock of 20% (w/v) SDS

That is all that is stated in the problem.

Homework Equations



I'm assuming for w/v the volume would be 0.5L but the weight I'm not sure.


The Attempt at a Solution



0.5L x .20 = .1g SDS / .5 L .. is that correct? doesn't make sense to me.

Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does 20% SDS (w/v) mean? Once you know that, the answer will present itself...
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top