Hrm Congruence Proofs. Don't remember the rules

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1MileCrash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proofs Rules
1MileCrash
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
41
Hrm... Congruence Proofs. Don't remember the "rules"

Homework Statement



Take equals sign as congruence or equals based on context, please. Itex does not work in Opera.

Prove that for all n, 8^n = 1 (mod 7)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



This will be a proof by induction.

Consider the case where n = 1.

Since 8^1 = 8, and 8 - 1 = 7, which is divisible by 7, we see that 8 = 1 (mod 7).

Now, assume that this theorem holds for some k in the natural numbers.

Then,

8^k = [1]

(8)8^k = [8][1]
8^(k+1) = [1][1] (since we know that 8 = 1(mod 7))
8^(k+1) = [1]

Thus, 8^k+1 = 1 (mod 7)

Therefore, the theorem holds for all n.


Been a while... sorry if it's really terrible.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


1MileCrash said:

Homework Statement



Take equals sign as congruence or equals based on context, please. Itex does not work in Opera.

Prove that for all n, 8^n = 1 (mod 7)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



This will be a proof by induction.

Consider the case where n = 1.

Since 8^1 = 8, and 8 - 1 = 7, which is divisible by 7, we see that 8 = 1 (mod 7).

Now, assume that this theorem holds for some k in the natural numbers.

Then,

8^k = [1]

(8)8^k = [8][1]
8^(k+1) = [1][1] (since we know that 8 = 1(mod 7))
8^(k+1) = [1]

Thus, 8^k+1 = 1 (mod 7)

Therefore, the theorem holds for all n.


Been a while... sorry if it's really terrible.

Your logic is sound, but the work could be cleaned up in places. For example, you switch from 1 (mod 7) near the beginning to the [1] equivalence class. It would be better if you were consistent.

Also, what you wrote as 8^k+1 needs to be written as 8^(k + 1). This seems to have been a momentary lapse, as you wrote it correctly in the preceding work.

You might already know this, but 8^k+1 would be interpreted to mean 8k + 1, which isn't what you want.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top