Hubbard's & Hubbards Concrete To Abstract Function

CMoore
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
Hubbard's & Hubbards "Concrete To Abstract" Function

On page 215 of H&H Vector Calculus, Linear algebra and Differential Forms text the authors define something they call the "concrete to abstract function". It is defined as follows:

Let (x_1, ..., x_m) be a point in R^m and let {v_1, ..., v_m} be a set of vectors in V. The, the abstract to concrete function F is given by

F(x_1, ..., x_m) = x_1*v_1 + ... + x_m*v_m.

Is there another name/ standardized name for this function?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The dot product?
 


No...It's not a scalar product because the result is a vector, not a number; it's a mapping from R^m to V.
 


Ah good point
 


I don't see anything special about it; it's just a linear map from Rm to V that takes ei (the ith standard basis vector in Rm) to vi.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top