Hubble lookback time based on energy density.

toughcanesrock
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If the energy density of the vacuum were the value 10^133 eV/m^3 , what would the value of the Hubble lookback time be for such a universe with no curvature and no other matter?

Homework Equations


Possible equation...

...Lookback time = ln(1+z)/H

The Attempt at a Solution


I am not sure what to assume for z? And should I convert the energy density to kg/m^3. I am very confused, any direction for this question would be IMMENSELY appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tell us what you mean by Hubble lookback time.

Do you mean how far back in time a specific telescope e.g. the HST can see?
 
There is also a well-defined conventional quantity known as the Hubble time
it is not a "lookback" time and it is not associated with any particular telescope. It is just 1/H where H is the usual Hubble expansion rate "constant" (which is actually not constant over time)
The current value of the Hubble time is about 14.4 billion years.
Not to be confused with any "lookback" time.
 
Last edited:
R
marcus said:
There is also a well-defined conventional quantity known as the Hubble time
it is not a "lookback" time and it is not associated with any particular telescope. It is just 1/H where H is the usual Hubble expansion rate "constant" (which is actually not constant over time)
The current value of the Hubble time is about 14.4 billion years.
Not to be confused with any "lookback" time.

Right. So what my professor wants to know is what is the lookback time for a flat universe, with no matter, and a density of 10^133 eV/m . Would you know how to go about starting this? OmegaM would be 0 and OmegaK would be 0 right?
 
I'm not the right person to help you. In my universe "lookback" time doesn't mean anything unless you specify a telescope or an object you are looking at. If your professor were asking about the Hubble time then I would know how to proceed.

I would just multiply the energydensity by 8piG/3c^2 and that would give me H^2 and then the Hubble time is just 1/H and we're done.
It would be a simple application of the Friedmann equation and the Hubble time is constant in that situation.
 
marcus said:
I'm not the right person to help you. In my universe "lookback" time doesn't mean anything unless you specify a telescope or an object you are looking at. If your professor were asking about the Hubble time then I would know how to proceed.

I would just multiply the energydensity by 8piG/3c^2 and that would give me H^2 and then the Hubble time is just 1/H and we're done.
It would be a simple application of the Friedmann equation and the Hubble time is constant in that situation.
I think I will just do that, as that is what some of my peers are doing. Thanks so much for the assistance.
 
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
Back
Top