Hubble's Law and Acceleration: Are Distant Objects Accelerating Away from Us?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mechanic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hubble
AI Thread Summary
Hubble's law indicates that distant objects recede faster with increasing distance, leading to the question of whether they are accelerating away from us. The discussion highlights that while Hubble's constant (H) has been declining, it is expected to continue decreasing at a slowing rate due to dark energy effects, which implies a gradual leveling off rather than an increase in H. This means that while distant objects are indeed moving away, the rate of acceleration is not expected to increase indefinitely. The projected growth rate of large-scale distances is minimal, at about 1/173 of one percent per million years, and tools like the "Lightcone" calculator can illustrate these changes over time. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for grasping the implications of cosmic expansion and acceleration.
Mechanic
Messages
51
Reaction score
1
Hubble’s law tells us that the velocity of distant objects increases with distance as v = Hr. Does this mean that the farther a distant object gets the more rapidly that object will recede away from us? That is, are these distant objects accelerating away from us? Can we say
v = Hr, and so Acceleration = dv/dt =H dr/dt + r dH/dt = Hv = (H^2)r for constant H? Has such an acceleration been observed/measured?

Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
H(t) has been declining since the first few seconds of expansion (as far as we know) and according to best fit model matching observations (LambdaCDM, the standard one people use) has been declining for past billions of years and WILL CONTINUE to decline *but at a slowing rate*. This slowing of the rate that H(t) is declining corresponds to what they call "acceleration" or "dark energy effect"or "cosmological constant effect".

It is not expected to make H(t) ever increase, only slow decline and gradually makeH(t) essentially level outy to be constant. Then your equation is right! Constant H(t) would lead to exponential expansion. i.e. fixed percentage growth

The projected percentage growth rate of large-scale distances (not expected to affect galaxy scale distances) according to LCDM model is 1/173 of one percent per million years.

You might take a look at the tabular calculator that one of PF members made that shows past and future history. It will show the change o over time of 1/H or c/H (which grows as H decreases)

It is "Lightcone" calculator link in my sig. click on it, you can adjust the parameters at will.

You can get it to show the acceleration in distance growth that started around year 7 billion. but that takes a little work, so ask questions if you want on how to use it.
 
Thanks for the info. It will take a while to fully digest...but the fact the distant objects are moving from us at v=Hr and ACCELERATING away from us as/if H(t) is constant is very interesting.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top