Human cloning was yet scientifically possible

  • Thread starter Thread starter The_Absolute
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cloning Human
AI Thread Summary
Human cloning is currently considered scientifically plausible, although the technology to make it viable is not yet available. The discussion highlights that while cloning has been successfully performed on animals, such as sheep, the process is complex and often results in imperfect copies. Ethical concerns and legal bans in many countries hinder research and development in this area, leading to a lack of significant advancements. The conversation also raises questions about whether there are countries where human cloning is not legally prohibited and why researchers do not relocate to those places to advance cloning techniques.
The_Absolute
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
http://en.rian.ru/russia/20100329/158353194.html

I didn't even realize that human cloning was yet scientifically possible. I know that some scientists cloned a sheep many years ago. But other than that, I didn't know people could be plausibly cloned yet.
 
Biology news on Phys.org


The_Absolute said:
http://en.rian.ru/russia/20100329/158353194.html

I didn't even realize that human cloning was yet scientifically possible. I know that some scientists cloned a sheep many years ago. But other than that, I didn't know people could be plausibly cloned yet.

The technology to make human cloning viable isn't really availible but that by no means is to say that it's not scientifically possible.
 


The_Absolute said:
I didn't even realize that human cloning was yet scientifically possible. I know that some scientists cloned a sheep many years ago. But other than that, I didn't know people could be plausibly cloned yet.

A sheep is really no different (in terms of making a clone), than a human would be...so yes, it is certainly plausible.
 


I still can't figure out why it's banned everywhere beforehand. Whats the big deal? Too many Sci-Fi movies?
 


the cloned animals arent perfect copies of the original. The sheep picture we see when we google it was like the 300th trial before they finally got something that could grow up and didnt die. The theory and protocols used are extremely expensive and because of all the bans, no one has really made any significant efforts in improving the methods.

It's ethical issues that prevents people from pursuing it
 


mazinse said:
because of all the bans, no one has really made any significant efforts in improving the methods.

Are there countries where human cloning is not legally forbidden? If yes, why people who want to improve the methods do not move to those countries?
 
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top