Human Eyes See Cosmic Bubbles that Algorithms Miss

AI Thread Summary
Recent discoveries reveal over 5,000 cosmic bubbles in the Milky Way, identified by citizen scientists, indicating active star formation driven by young, hot stars. This suggests that the Milky Way may be more dynamic in star creation than previously believed. The discussion highlights the remarkable ability of the human brain to recognize patterns, often outperforming algorithms in tasks like identifying faces or simple drawings. Examples include how human pattern recognition contributed to discovering new planets from NASA's Kepler data. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the unique capabilities of human cognition in areas where computers still struggle.
Dotini
Gold Member
Messages
634
Reaction score
231
I thought this story was charming, since it hints that there still might be a few things people can do that computers cannot (yet) do. I have no idea of the significance of these bubbles, but I'd be interested to hear others comments.

http://www.space.com/14846-milkyway-space-bubbles-citizen-science.html
More than 5,000 space bubbles have been discovered in the disk of our Milky Way galaxy by a team of part-time citizen scientists.

These bubbles are blown by young, hot stars into the surrounding gas and dust, and indicate areas of brand-new star formation, scientists say.

"These findings make us suspect that the Milky Way is a much more active star-forming galaxy than previously thought," Eli Bressert, an astrophysics doctoral student at the European Southern Observatory, said in a statement. "The Milky Way's disk is like champagne with bubbles all over the place."


Respectfully submitted,
Steve
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The human brain is absolutely astounding in its ability to do pattern recognition. To me the surprise is not at all that there are "still" things the brain can do that algorithms can't (yet) but rather than algorithms can do as much as they CAN at this relatively early stage of computer development.

My favorite example is this: Have you ever seen a VERY simple line drawing that represents, say, Bob Hope, or Alfred Hitchcock? People have recognized those drawing on seeing them for the first time but it's pretty much unthinkable that a computer could come anywhere close to doing that.

EDIT: I once read an article that explained in some detail how pattern recognition is a survival mechanism in humans (and other animals), and also how it causes the "false positives" that sometimes make us think we are seeing something that on closer inspection turns out to be a random pattern that we misinterpreted.
 
It continually fascinates me how little information I need to be able to identify a familiar face in a crowd. A split second flash of 25% of their face, (2% of the whole person), from virtually any angle, in a database of thousands of people I know by sight.
 
In January, the NASA Kepler team decided to let citizens take a look at data that their algorithms had already gone through. In form of graphs generated by the brightness of the stars. The point was to spot a pattern in the transitions, that could possibly prove to be a planet or a binary star. And again, human pattern recognition had its say. I think it actually led to the discovery of one or more planets. The one I heard of was Neptune sized..
 
DaveC426913 said:
It continually fascinates me how little information I need to be able to identify a familiar face in a crowd. A split second flash of 25% of their face, (2% of the whole person), from virtually any angle, in a database of thousands of people I know by sight.

Yeah. Or how quickly we can identify a melody. Sometimes two or three notes will do it.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Back
Top