Hydraulics help please -- Energy loss in a long pipeline

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of energy loss in a long pipeline, focusing on the application of energy conservation equations in fluid dynamics. Participants explore various assumptions and methodologies related to pressure, velocity heads, and energy head definitions in the context of hydraulic systems.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of assuming P1=0 and equal velocity heads, suggesting that P1 is actually 1 atm unless specified otherwise.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need to derive an equation that accounts for energy loss, indicating that the problem requires a focus on energy loss per unit length rather than power loss.
  • There is a discussion about the definition of "energy head," which includes potential energy, velocity head, and pressure head.
  • Some participants express confusion about the assumptions regarding pressure and velocity heads, particularly in relation to the energy head given in the problem statement.
  • One participant calculates values for y2, P2/γ, and velocity head at section 2, leading to a derived head loss (hL) value, while questioning the assumptions made about P1 and velocity head at section 1.
  • Another participant reflects on the implications of using Darcy's equation and the Hazen-Williams equation in combination, questioning whether they yield the same loss.
  • There is a mention of the continuity equation and its application in systems with varying reservoir sizes, raising questions about the relationship between velocity and head loss.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the assumptions regarding pressure and velocity heads, with no consensus reached on the validity of these assumptions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the application of various equations and the interpretation of energy head.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the problem's assumptions, such as the lack of information on roughness and temperature, which affects the determination of the friction factor in calculations.

fayan77
Messages
84
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Screen Shot 2018-10-04 at 7.43.51 PM.png

Homework Equations


y1 + P1/##\gamma##+v1/2g=y2 + P2/##\gamma##+v2/2g+hL

The Attempt at a Solution


I used the above equation and assumed that P1=0 and both velocity heads are equal. Is that valid? However I did not need to use the geometry of the pipe so I think I am doing something wrong. Can someone point me in the right direction?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-10-04 at 7.43.51 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-10-04 at 7.43.51 PM.png
    12.6 KB · Views: 777
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are right, the pipe is uniform, but since the problem asked for energy loss, you must derive (from the energy conservation equation) a correct equation that has some kind of energy loss. In the end it must be some kind of power loss ##P=\frac {dW} {dt}##.
Sorry I loss my mind for a moment, yes it's the loss per feet.
 
Last edited:
Im looking for energy loss in terms of feet not power loss. I have a lot of information
Pressure
heights
flow rate
length
diameter
no roughness
what is throwing me off is that if I use general energy equation are my assumptions correct that P1=0 and that velocity heads are eqaual?
If i use darcy weisbach eq. i do not have temperature or roughness to help me determine friction factor
 
I think P1 is 1atm, not 0 like you assumed, this pressure (P1) only equal zero if the head is placed in vacuum, or the inlet pressure is the reference pressure. In the first case the water would be boiled off to vacuum and then this question would be invalid. In the second case I believe they must first say that the reference is at that point (the inlet). They just say the pressure at the outlet is 18psi so that mean it is the absolute pressure (reference to vacuum) and that the inlet pressure is at normal condition of 1atm. For the velocity I think they are equal.
 
What is the definition of "energy head?"
 
potential energy of a static column of water (height) + velocity head + pressure head... the equation I have written above
 
The give you the energy head at point 1 and they give you everything you need to calculate the energy head at point 2. The difference is the energy loss (head).
 
So my assumptions are correct? velocity heads are the same and that pressure at the top = 0? And while I have you here, does Darcy's equation and Heinz-Williams yield the same loss? can I use them in combination to solve for a particular problem?
 
fayan77 said:
So my assumptions are correct? velocity heads are the same and that pressure at the top = 0? And while I have you here, does Darcy's equation and Heinz-Williams yield the same loss? can I use them in combination to solve for a particular problem?
None of this is right. We have $$y_1+\frac{p_1}{\gamma}+\frac{v_1^2}{2g}=80\ ft$$From the information provided in the problem statement, what are ##y_2##, ##\frac{P_2}{\gamma}##, and ##\frac{v_2^2}{2g}##?
 
  • #10
y2 = 12
P2/##\gamma## = 18*144/62.4 =41.5
velocity head @ section 2 = (Q/A)2/64.4 = .14

solving for hL = 80 - 12 - 41.5 - .14 = 26.36 ft

why is P1 = 0? and why is velocity head @ section 1 = 0?
 
  • #11
fayan77 said:
y2 = 12
P2/##\gamma## = 18*144/62.4 =41.5
velocity head @ section 2 = (Q/A)2/64.4 = .14

solving for hL = 80 - 12 - 41.5 - .14 = 26.36 ft
Correct
why is P1 = 0? and why is velocity head @ section 1 = 0?
Who says?[/QUOTE]
 
  • #12
OOOOOHHHH I see, problem states energy head for section 1 as a whole is 80 ft I was fixated that 80ft was y1... got it

Thank you.

On another note whenever I am solving a problem with a two reservoir system we assume velocity heads are zero because of their size the dh/dt is basically 0 correct? So if I have a system with only one reservoir i will have an equation like so, Energy head section 1 = velocity head + hL can I use continuity equation to solve for velocity or will velocity vary with head loss?
 
  • #13
fayan77 said:
OOOOOHHHH I see, problem states energy head for section 1 as a whole is 80 ft I was fixated that 80ft was y1... got it

Thank you.

On another note whenever I am solving a problem with a two reservoir system we assume velocity heads are zero because of their size the dh/dt is basically 0 correct? So if I have a system with only one reservoir i will have an equation like so, Energy head section 1 = velocity head + hL can I use continuity equation to solve for velocity or will velocity vary with head loss?
For any reservoir, dh/dt is usually small.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: roam

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K