Hydrogen excitation (griffiths 9.1)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving problem 9.1 from Griffiths' quantum mechanics book, focusing on hydrogen wavefunctions and allowed excitations between energy levels n=1 and n=2. It is noted that only one excitation is permitted to simplify integration, but the specific wavefunctions that do not apply are unclear. Participants discuss the vanishing of certain integrands due to symmetry, specifically those that are odd in z or contain e^{+/- i φ}. The conversation also includes casual interactions among students, indicating a collaborative study environment. Overall, the thread emphasizes the challenge of identifying the correct wavefunctions for the problem.
wizzart
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to solve problem 9.1 from griffiths book on quantum mechanics. I've written down the hydrogen wavefunctions for all combinations allowed of n, l and m. Now according to griffiths (and my memory) only one excitation is actually allowed between n=1 and n=2. This would minimize the amount of integration. Problem is, I can't find out which wave functions have no business here. Any help would be welcome, spec. if you could give the correct set of n,l,m and motivation (so don't start TEX-ing in all the wave functions, there in the book).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As you are integrating over all of space all integrands that are odd in z vanish. Furthermore integrands containing e^{+/- i \phi} vanish for more or less the same reason.
 
tx

slowly figuring it out...Thanks Willem, see you on Friday
 
wizzart said:
slowly figuring it out...Thanks Willem, see you on Friday

:biggrin: :-p Wizzart...aka?!
 
:smile: Rutger, 4th year student, doing lotsa 3rd year stuff. Usually talking with people like Egge, Erwin or Martijn. Check the picture on my website, probably more useful than vague descriptions... :smile:
 
Aha, Rutger... Nice site, and cartoons! I especially liked the one about Steve Vai :wink: . Good luck studying QM...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top