Hydrogen probability distribution

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13
I have found that:

For l = 1:

\sum_{m=-l}^l |Y_l^m|^2 = \frac{3}{4\pi}

For l = 2:

\sum_{m=-l}^l |Y_l^m|^2 = \frac{5}{4\pi}

What significance does this have for the probability distribution in an hydrogen atom?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the significance is that there are five-thirds as many states of orbital angular momentum l=2, than for l=1. This makes sense because there are five orbitals for l=2, and three orbitals for l=1, for all the values of m.
 
Last edited:
Do you know what those terms mean?
Do you know why you did the sum in each case?
 
Simon Bridge said:
Do you know what those terms mean?
Do you know why you did the sum in each case?

I think the numerator gives the degeneracy for a certain l?

since -l ≤ m ≤ l, m can take on 2l+1 possible values.

Like possible states for |n,l,m>:

For l = 1:

Possible states are |n,1,-1> and |n,1,0> and |n,1,1>
 
I think the numerator gives the degeneracy for a certain l?
Each spin/orbit state contributes a factor of ##1/4\pi## to the overall thingy being calculated.

But I meant the terms on the RHS.

For a particular |n,l,m> state, what does |Ylm|2 mean?

Now - what was your question?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top