Hydrostatic Force: Impact on Sidewall and Bottom of Box

AI Thread Summary
Increasing the height of liquid in a box, while displacing it with a solid object, raises the hydrostatic pressure on the sidewall due to the depth of the liquid column, despite the total weight of the liquid remaining unchanged. The pressure at any point in a fluid is determined by the height of the fluid above that point, which means the force on the sidewall increases with height. When considering the force on the bottom of the box, the weight calculation should focus on the volume of the liquid alone, as the negligible weight of any air pocket does not significantly impact the overall force. The shape of the container does not affect the pressure at a given depth; it remains consistent across different geometries. Understanding these principles of hydrostatic pressure clarifies how depth influences force in fluid dynamics.
Shaneo58
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
You have a rectangle box filled with a liquid to height H. How will the force on the sidewall of the box change if the height (H) is increased without adding anymore fluid? (i.e. a smaller solid box is added to displace the liquid). Assuming the equation F=specific weight*depth of center point*Area of the sidewall, holds true then the force would increase based on the height increase. I have a hard time understanding this because the weight of the water in not increased. How would this same situation affect the force on the bottom of the box?

Thanks for the input!:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It does take some thought! Often an "extreme" thought experiment yields clues:

Think of this situation: what is the "sidewall" pressure containing the water when you open the box and all the water spills out in a huge, maybe infinite, flat puddle...any "pressure" on the non existent "sidewalls"...none, right, maybe a smidgeon of capilary something or other at the edge...so somehow depth DOES seem to make a difference!

Try reading the introduction at Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrostatic_pressure#Hydrostatic_pressure

it has your answers...and the basic assumptions (such a unchanging gravity with height and an incompressible liquid, uniform temperature,etc ); you want to think in terms of hydrostatic pressure (and force, if you like). (P = pgh)

That pressure is dependent in your example only on the height of the column of water...the pressure, for example, ten feet down in the ocean is the same as in your container if it is ten feet high and filled with water, right??

Will the sidewall pressure change if it's a cylinder or triangle shaped container with the same water depth??
 
Ok, so if you are trying to find the force at the bottom of the box, which would be the weight of the liquid (weight=volume*density*g), and had a situation where there was a pocket of air right in the middle of the liquid.

Would you take the total volume, including that pocket of air, in your volume calculations even though its weight is almost nothing compared to the liquid?

Or

Would you calculate the total volume and subtract the volume of air, saying that the weight at the bottom of the box is due almost entirely to the liquid?

Because the the air has very little mass I don't see how it can effect the force on the bottom of the box.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top