Hydrostatic pressure distribution despite fluid motion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conditions under which hydrostatic pressure distribution can be assumed in fluid dynamics, particularly when fluid motion is present. It is established that if the fluid velocity vector is horizontal and uniform, the pressure variation in the vertical direction can be considered hydrostatic. The Navier-Stokes equations and the continuity equation are referenced as foundational principles that support this assertion. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these equations to fully grasp the implications of fluid motion on pressure distribution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Navier-Stokes equations
  • Familiarity with the continuity equation
  • Basic knowledge of fluid dynamics concepts
  • Experience with Cartesian coordinate systems in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Navier-Stokes equations in detail
  • Examine the continuity equation and its applications in fluid dynamics
  • Research hydrostatic pressure conditions in moving fluids
  • Explore the implications of velocity vector uniformity on pressure distribution
USEFUL FOR

Fluid dynamics students, engineers, and researchers interested in the principles of pressure distribution in moving fluids and the application of the Navier-Stokes equations.

Kqwert
Messages
160
Reaction score
3
Hello,

in some exam questions I've looked at it is stated that the pressure distribution is hydrostatic, even though there is fluid motion. (In these cases the velocity has been constant over the section where the pressure is said to be hydrostatic). Is it really possible to assume that the pressure varies hydrostatically when there's fluid motion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the fluid velocity vector is horizontal everywhere, then it's OK to call the pressure variation in the vertical direction hydrostatic. Otherwise, the pressure should be referred to as "static" pressure or (just plain) pressure.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kqwert
Chestermiller said:
If the fluid velocity vector is horizontal everywhere, then it's OK to call the pressure variation in the vertical direction hydrostatic. Otherwise, the pressure should be referred to as "static" pressure or (just plain) pressure.
Thank you, but shouldn't the velocity vector be uniform as well?

i.e

--->
--->
--->
--->
 
Kqwert said:
Thank you, but shouldn't the velocity vector be uniform as well?

i.e

--->
--->
--->
--->
If the flow is horizontal, then the velocity in the z direction is zero and, from the Navier Stokes equations and the continuity equation, it will be hydrostatic in the z direction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kqwert
Chestermiller said:
If the flow is horizontal, then the velocity in the z direction is zero and, from the Navier Stokes equations and the continuity equation, it will be hydrostatic in the z direction.
Thank you. Do you have any links explaining this?
 
Kqwert said:
Thank you. Do you have any links explaining this?
Do you have any background on the Navier Stokes equations and the continuity equation, or are you relatively new to fluid dynamics?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kqwert
Chestermiller said:
Do you have any background on the Navier Stokes equations and the continuity equation, or are you relatively new to fluid dynamics?
I am familiar with the continuity equation, but not very familiar with Navier Stokes.
 
Kqwert said:
I am familiar with the continuity equation, but not very familiar with Navier Stokes.
OK. Google the Navier Stokes equations, and examine them for a Cartesian Coordinate system.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kqwert

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K