Hyperbolic Functions_Defining Sech^-1 x

  • Thread starter Thread starter Beamsbox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hyperbolic
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around defining the inverse hyperbolic secant function, sech-1x, particularly in terms of exponential functions. Participants are exploring the properties and definitions associated with this function.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand how to express sech-1x in terms of ex and are discussing the properties of inverse functions. There are questions about what calculations are involved in finding the inverse and how to properly define the function.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing insights and questioning each other's understanding of the inverse function. Some have suggested methods for expressing the function, while others are seeking clarification on the definitions and calculations involved.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the proper notation and definitions, as well as varying levels of familiarity with the concept of inverse functions. Some participants are referencing external resources for further understanding.

Beamsbox
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
I have a problem that deals with the inverse sech function. sech-1 x

Trouble is I don't know how to define this in terms of ex

Such as:

definitionsech.png


How would I represent the function sech^-1 x, by definition?
 

Attachments

  • definition sech.png
    definition sech.png
    873 bytes · Views: 681
Physics news on Phys.org
By the property that it's the inverse of sech of x, of course, at least where sech x is bijective.

So

\sech \left(\sech^{-1} x\right) = x
 
bigubau said:
\sech \left(\sech^{-1} x\right) = x

Sorry, I'm not quite sure what you've written here...

Perhaps it's the definition of inverse, that I'm not 'seeing'...

Say, for x/y, the inverse would be xy?

For, x+y/z, the inverse would be (z(y-x))...? Exactly which calculations do you 'invert', all of them?

I'm going to look more into this, @:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_function
 
Last edited:
The tex code didn't parse correctly, or I haven't written the right code for the sech function.

So the approach to find the inverse of y=f(x) is to express x=g(y). Can you do that ?
 
I know how to do that for a simple function like y=(x+2)/3, but I'm not sure with this one, how to go about it... here's an attempt, any insights would be nice. ;)
math.jpg


I thik that once I have a definition for sech-1 x, that I can move forward on my own...
 
make x = sech y; hence: y = sech-1 x

Define sech in terms of ey, then solve for y.

No u-substitution necessary, but the quadratic equation comes into play.

Thanks for your help, bigubau.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
13K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K