Hyperbolic Geometry: Parameterization of Curves for Hyperbolic Distance

Phoenixtears
Messages
82
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the points P = (1/2, √3/2) and Q = (1,1). They lie on the half circle of radius one centered at (1,0).

a) Use the deifnition and properites of the hyperbolic distance (and length) to compute dH(P,Q).

b) Compute the coordinates of the images of Pa nd Q through the standard inversion and use that to evaluate again dH(P,Q).


Homework Equations



Our professor gave us a few trig identites to use, but other than that we need the equation for Hyperbolic distance:

∫ \sqrt{}x&#039;(t)<sup>2</sup>+y&#039;(t)<sup>2</sup> \frac{}{}y(t)
From a to b where a < t < b

The Attempt at a Solution



Ignoring the question almost entirely, the part that I can't figure out is how to parameterize this correctly. My professor gave us a solution that gave one option for a parameterization, but I'm not sure how he got there.

His solution:
x(t) = cost +1
y(t)= sint

I believe that more than one parameterization would work, but how do you come up with the one that makes things simplest?

Thank you so much!

Phoenix
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, I feel a little silly for not understanding his parameterization, but I do understand it now. My question then moves to if there is a quick trick to parameterizing potentially more difficult curves in the hyperbolic plane?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top