A/m Hysteresis Loop: Wide vs Narrow Differences & Importance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the differences between wide and narrow hysteresis loops in ferromagnetic materials, emphasizing that narrower loops indicate softer materials that require less energy for magnetization and demagnetization, thus minimizing energy losses. The area within the hysteresis loop represents the work done during one cycle of magnetization. Coercivity is highlighted as a key factor that influences the loop's area, with specific values provided for iron and samarium-cobalt. There is some confusion regarding the term coercivity, with one participant questioning its relation to material softness. The thread also includes a request for assistance with a B-H curve for a transformer in Maxwell software.
Dash-IQ
Messages
106
Reaction score
1
Wide/Narrow Hysteresis loops, what's the difference?

When calculating the work done to magnetize a ferromagnetic material, calculating the hysteresis loop is the right way?
I know the narrower loop(soft) needs less energy(work) to magnetize or demagnetize it is that true?
That's why it's best to use Soft ferromagnetic materials to minimize losses in energy etc...?

image004.jpg


What is the importance of coercivity? It determines the "area" of the hysteresis loop?
Iron = 160 A/m
samarium-cobalt = 3.2 x 106
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes alihashemi9091
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Dash-IQ! :smile:
Dash-IQ said:
When calculating the work done to magnetize a ferromagnetic material, calculating the hysteresis loop is the right way?
I know the narrower loop(soft) needs less energy(work) to magnetize or demagnetize it is that true?
That's why it's best to use Soft ferromagnetic materials to minimize losses in energy etc...?

Yes, the area inside the hysteresis loop shows exactly the amount of the work done in one cycle. :wink:
What is the importance of coercivity? It determines the "area" of the hysteresis loop?
Iron = 160 A/m
samarium-cobalt = 3.2 x 106

I'm not familiar with coercivity … i thought it was just another word for "softness"? :confused:

Can anyone else answer this? o:)
 
i want a b-h curve of a 20kv/400v transformer in maxwell software...any body help me?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top