I admit, I only had wrong impression

  • Thread starter Thread starter deda
  • Start date Start date
deda
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
regarding my page Einstein vs him self I must admit I was wrong due to an optical illusion reading my primary book.

In "General physics 1" by dr.Zafir Stojanov Skopje 1995 I had this equations:
L'=L\sqrt{1-\frac{V^2}{c^2}} for contraction of length and
T=\frac{T'}{\sqrt{1-\frac{V^2}{c^2}}} for dilation of time

In "Special theory of relativity" by dr. Vida Zigman Belgrade 1997 I have this equations:
L'=L\sqrt{1-\frac{V^2}{c^2}} for contraction of length and
T'=T\sqrt{1-\frac{V^2}{c^2}} for dilation of time.

If one looks carefully he'll notice that those two sets of equations are actually identical but only expressed differently. I always tougth that the time measured in rest frame is the shortest but in fact it's the longest. when traveling at greater speeds the observer measures both shorter length and proportionally shorter time.

\frac{L'}{T'}=\frac{L}{T} this ratio is some speed that is constant and same in any frame. It's c. SR tries to measure every thing trhu c.

I'll sure have more questions as I make progress knowing SR. At this time I'll be just quite.

My appologies for all the incovinience.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Deda,
I will be moving this to the Special Relativity section.
But... I am very glad to hear you say "Ahh... I See!"

This is a very good thing! Congratulations!

Such moments are often turning points in an education in Physics.
It is a very satisfying feeling.. Yes?
 


Thank you for acknowledging your mistake and admitting that you had a wrong impression. It takes courage and humility to admit when we are wrong, and it shows that you are open-minded and willing to learn.

It is understandable that you may have been confused by the different expressions of the equations in the two books you mentioned. However, as you have discovered, they are actually equivalent and represent the same concept. This is a common occurrence in physics, where different authors may use different notations or expressions to represent the same idea.

It is also important to note that the concept of time dilation and length contraction in special relativity can be counterintuitive and may go against our everyday experiences. But as you continue to study and delve deeper into the theory, you will gain a better understanding and be able to make sense of these concepts.

I encourage you to continue your studies and ask questions whenever you have doubts or need clarification. That is the best way to learn and improve your understanding. Keep an open mind and don't be afraid to make mistakes, as they are an essential part of the learning process.

Once again, thank you for acknowledging your mistake and I wish you all the best in your studies of special relativity.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
2K
Back
Top