I am trying to build a basketball shooter.

  • Thread starter Thread starter notmot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basketball Build
AI Thread Summary
A user is attempting to build an air cannon to shoot basketballs halfway across a court, seeking validation for their calculations. They estimate the required acceleration at 13.4 m/s and the force needed at 8.236077N, translating to approximately 32.9 psi. The forum members welcome the user and provide a resource for further understanding of projectile motion. The user expresses a desire to delete the thread but is reassured that it is acceptable to keep it. The discussion highlights the user's enthusiasm for physics and the community's supportive response.
notmot
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello this is my first post so if i do anything wrong pleas tell me so thanks.
So i am trying to make an air cannon to shoot basketballs half way across a basketball court not into the hoop but just bellow it. Can you tell me if my calculations are correct?. The half the court is 42 feet(12.8 meters) long the ball's mass is 0.623689. I Think that the acceleration needed would be 13.4 m/s including the force of gravity (for now just gravity in a vacuum with no air resistance ) at a 45 degree angle. so i think i would need 8.236077N witch i think is 32.903779 psi.

PS


Sorry if i am horribly wrong but i am rather young and new to physics
 
Physics news on Phys.org
how do i delete this thread?
 
Why delete this one? It's fine.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top