I don't understand why the node voltage here is zero(this is for circuits class)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the node voltage in a circuit analysis problem involving Thevenin and Norton equivalents. Participants are trying to clarify why a specific node voltage is considered zero and how it relates to the overall circuit behavior, particularly in the context of finding a current (Ix).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about why the top node voltage is zero, questioning if it should have some voltage due to its connection to Vt.
  • Another participant points out that both nodes appear to be directly connected, implying they should have the same voltage.
  • A suggestion is made to redraw the circuit for clarity, asking for an explanation of why the voltage at the node is zero and why the current through a resistor is zero.
  • One participant requests a complete problem statement to better understand the context, indicating that the provided information is insufficient.
  • Another participant challenges the assumption that the bottom node is the reference node, suggesting that if the apparent short circuit is removed, the voltage at that node would not be zero unless Vt is zero.
  • A detailed analysis is provided involving Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL), with equations derived to express the relationship between voltages and currents in the circuit.
  • Concerns are raised about the clarity of the original sketch and the need for meticulousness in circuit analysis to avoid mistakes.
  • Some participants express doubts about the level of effort shown by the original poster, suggesting that the question may exceed typical high school level understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the assumptions regarding the reference node or the conditions under which the node voltage is considered zero. Multiple competing views remain regarding the interpretation of the circuit and the application of circuit laws.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the provided information, including missing details about the circuit schematic and variable definitions, which may affect the clarity of the discussion.

bambam123456
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
My teacher was going over a thevenin and norton circuit and i understand the thevenin and norton part of it, but the part that confused me was when he did the node voltage at the 2 circled nodes to find Ix. I understand why the bottom node would be zero because it is the reference node but why is the top one zero. I have uploaded a picture of the notes and circled the node where i need help with. Since its connected to Vt wouldn't it have some voltage?
 

Attachments

  • 2011-09-17 16.40.23.jpg
    2011-09-17 16.40.23.jpg
    19.2 KB · Views: 657
Engineering news on Phys.org
Haven't you shown both nodes connected directly together?
 
the circuit can be redrawn like this. Can you explain why the voltage at the node is zero and why the current running through the resistor is zero?
 

Attachments

  • 2011-09-17 18.31.48.jpg
    2011-09-17 18.31.48.jpg
    13.7 KB · Views: 571
can anybody help me?
 
Are you sure that bottom one is reference node?

Can you please post a full problem. I have little to work with here, and I cannot see everything clearly. Post the original schematics with variables etc.
 
bambam123456 said:
can anybody help me?

If the "bottom node" is the reference and if you remove the apparent short circuit that you had in you first diagram then yes you are correct, the voltage at that node is not zero (unless VT=0). It is in fact 4 V_T /19.
 
how sure are you about your sketch?

i observe Vt's polarity is + up.
I observe the current source's polarity is + right so they oppose.
I can't read what is value of current source - is it 2ix ?

If so, write KVL around circuit

start at bottom of vvoltage source go ccw

-Vt + 5i5 +4ix = 0
;
;
and KCL at upper circled node

i5 -ix -2ix = 0
which yields: i5=3ix
;
;
plug into KVL equation

-Vt +5(3ix) +4ix = 0

Vt = 19ix
ix = Vt/19

what uart said

i used to make lots of mistakes from less than meticulous handwriting so i reverted to printing.

I suggest something is not transcribed correctly.
You need to work KVL and KCL until they become as natural to you as a Crescent wrench and you have confidence in them.
They will never lie, but one must be meticulous.

Believe me, i have earned the right to preach that message. "Sinners make good saints for they've learned the hard way"

what if your current source were 2i5 instead of 2ix ?

What if the question is to find value of current source that makes your node in question be zero?

check with some other students to verify you are answering right question, then show instructor what KVL and KCL have to say..be prepared, solve for the value of current source that WOULD make ix zero and show him.

old jim
 
Last edited:
This question is well above high school level since it appears to involve a controlled current source.

We normally expect some sign of effort on the part of the student, is that evident here?
 
Studiot said:
This question is well above high school level since it appears to involve a controlled current source.

We normally expect some sign of effort on the part of the student, is that evident here?

had the same feeling.
 
  • #10
that's a big ten-oops there, good buddies.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K