I get two different answers when solving a kinematics problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a kinematics problem involving a car that accelerates over 200 meters with an initial velocity of 2.0 m/s and a final velocity of 6 m/s over 12 seconds. Two methods yield different acceleration results: one calculates an acceleration of 0.33 m/s², while the other gives 2.4 m/s². The discrepancy arises because the problem's parameters imply incompatible conditions, as the distance covered at the final speed would not match the given distance of 200 meters. It is concluded that the problem is flawed, as it does not specify constant acceleration, leading to confusion in determining the correct acceleration. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding average velocity and its implications in kinematics problems.
LugubriuousLamia
Messages
10
Reaction score
3
1. A car accelerates for 200 meters and has an initial velocity of 2.0 m/s and a final velocity of 6 m/s. What is the acceleration of the car if this change in velocity takes 12 seconds?

Homework Equations


a=Δv/Δt
Δx=Vi*t+.5at2[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


When I solve this using the first equation I get the acceleration is equal to .33 m/s2 because (6m/s - 2m/s)/ 12 seconds = .33 m/s2

However when I use Δx=Vi*t+.5at2 I get[/B]

200m= 2m/s*12 sec+.5*a*12 sec2
With a being equal to 2.4 m/s2

Which of these answers would be the correct answer to this problem. I am inclined to believe that the correct answer would be the first answer. However I am not sure as to why this would be the case. I am looking for a concrete reason as to why one solution would be more correct than the other.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming that the acceleration is constant, your results show that the assumptions on the distance, velocities, and time are incompatible. Note that (12 s)(6 m/s) = 72 m so even if the car was moving at the listed final speed for all of the 12 s, it would not reach a distance of 200 m.
 
The only thing I can see is that the equation based on ##\Delta x## assumes that acceleration is constant, which is not specified in the problem. The best you can do is to calculate the average acceleration, using ##\Delta v / \Delta t##.

Edit: beaten by @Orodruin
 
John Mantia said:
1. A car accelerates for 200 meters and has an initial velocity of 2.0 m/s and a final velocity of 6 m/s. What is the acceleration of the car if this change in velocity takes 12 seconds?

For future reference: if you have uniform acceleration from ##2m/s## to ##6m/s##, then the average velocity during this time is ##4m/s##.

And, if the time for this acceleration is ##12s##, then the displacement during this time is ##\Delta x = (4m/s)12s = 48m##.

Note: In general, the average velocity is ##\frac12 (v_i + v_f)## (assuming constant acceleration). Which is, in fact, half way between the two.

Also, if a car travels ##200m## in ##12s##, then its average velocity during this time is ##16.7m/s##, which is significantly greater than the speeds involved in your question.

Using average velocity is perhaps a good way to get a bit more intuition about the sort of numbers you expect in answer to these questions.
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude
Thank you for the replies, it would seem that the problem is inherently flawed so there is no actual answer than can be obtained.
 
That depends on your definition of "inherently flawed". I could certainly produce an acceleration profile that satisfies the given data, but it will not be a motion with constant acceleration.
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top