I have a test and need some desperate help on functions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving composite functions involving f(x) = 6/(3-x) and g(x) = 5/3x. The user successfully calculated f(g(x)) but struggled with determining the domain and range. For the domain, it was clarified that the exclusion of x = 5/9 is necessary because it leads to g(x) = 3, which is outside the domain of f. The correct range was established as (-∞, 0) U (0, 2) U (2, ∞), after considering the horizontal asymptote and the values excluded from the range of f(g(x)). Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of composite functions and the importance of understanding domain and range interactions.
nando94
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I got a test and I am having trouble on functions. On the quiz we had this problem on composite functions.

given f(x) = 6/(3-x) and g(x) = 5/3x find the following

a. f of g

b. the domain of f of g

c. the range of f of g


My attempts

a. For a I got 6/3 - 5/3x = 18x/9x - 5 which was the right answer. No problems here. However I am stuck on b and c.

b.For b I got (-infinity, 0) (0, 5/9) (5/9, 3) (3,infinity). My teacher marked the 3's as wrong
and I don't know why. What I did was found the domain of f and g sperately and then excluded them from f of g. So I am kind of confused.

c. Right answer was (-infinity,0) (0,2) (2,infinity) For the range I kind of forgot how to find the range! But I found the inverse of f of g and then used the domain of the inverse since that's the range which was (-infinity,2)(2,infinity). Then I realized that since these were rational functions it was the horizontal asymptote but I am not sure if that's the right reason.

I really need help with this!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
nando94 said:
a. For a I got 6/3 - 5/3x = 18x/9x - 5 which was the right answer. No problems here. However I am stuck on b and c.
Oh, really? What you wrote is
\frac{6}{3} - \frac{5}{3x} = \frac{18x}{9x} - 5
... and that's not the answer. (In other words, PLEASE use parentheses!)

nando94 said:
b.For b I got (-infinity, 0) (0, 5/9) (5/9, 3) (3,infinity). My teacher marked the 3's as wrong
and I don't know why. What I did was found the domain of f and g sperately and then excluded them from f of g. So I am kind of confused.
The domain of g (the inner function) is (-∞, 0) U (0, ∞). The range is the same. The domain of f (the outer function), however, is (-∞, 3) U (3, ∞). The domain of f(g(x)) consists of all x-values in the domain of g that map to g(x)-values in the domain of f.

The problem here is that the range of g includes one value, 3, that cannot be in the domain of f. So you need the x-value so that g(x) = 3, and remove it from the domain of g. So solving
\frac{5}{3x}=3
gives you x = 5/9, and so the domain of f(g(x)) is
(-∞, 0) U (0, 5/9) U (5/9, ∞).

nando94 said:
c. Right answer was (-infinity,0) (0,2) (2,infinity) For the range I kind of forgot how to find the range! But I found the inverse of f of g and then used the domain of the inverse since that's the range which was (-infinity,2)(2,infinity). Then I realized that since these were rational functions it was the horizontal asymptote but I am not sure if that's the right reason.
Now that we removed x = 5/9 from the domain of g, its range now becomes
(-∞, 0) U (0, 3) U (3, ∞). But since the domain of f was (-∞, 3) U (3, ∞) (which included 0), we have to now find what f(0) is and remove it from the range of f.
f(0) = \frac{6}{3-0} = 2
Since the range of f was (-∞, 0) U (0, ∞), the range of f(g(x)) now becomes
(-∞, 0) U (0, 2) U (2, ∞).

If you think this was all confusing, you'd be right. I've just taught this to my precalculus students and most of them had trouble understanding it all. :cry:
 
Last edited:
Thanks I see it now. You don't include the 3 because your finding f(g(x)). So you have to find g(3) instead. So if if you had to do g(f(x)) then you would find f(0) instead right?
 
nando94 said:
Thanks I see it now. You don't include the 3 because your finding f(g(x)). So you have to find g(3) instead.
Not quite. I said that you have to find x-values such that g(x) = 3. It's not the same thing as finding g(3).

nando94 said:
So if if you had to do g(f(x)) then you would find f(0) instead right?
Again, not quite. Finding the domain of g(f(x)) is easier in this problem.
The range of f (now the inner function) is (-∞, 0) U (0, ∞).
The domain of g (now the outer function) is also (-∞, 0) U (0, ∞).
All values in the range of f are in the domain of g, so we don't have to "pull values out" of the domain of f.
So the domain of g(f(x)), in this case, is the same as the domain of f(x): (-∞, 3) U (3, ∞).
And since nothing was changed in the domain of g(f(x)), the range of g(f(x)) is the same as the range of g(x): (-∞, 0) U (0, ∞).
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top