I have an intuitive understanding of the definitions that will follow,

  • Thread starter Thread starter Noxide
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definitions
Noxide
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
I have an intuitive understanding of the definitions that will follow, but in my search to find specific definitions I only come up with vague explanations and contentious or subjective uses of those definitions. Please provide some definitions (mathematical) for the following list (and sources if possible):

proposition

lemma

corollary

theorem

principle

law

ruleThanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Noxide said:
proposition

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposition"
lemma
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemma_%28mathematics%29"

corollary
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corollary"

theorem
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theorem"

principle

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle"
law
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_law"

rule
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R.U.L.E."
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Many of the definitions listed depend on the definition of a proposition, however according to wikipedia (which I am aware of) there exists a great deal of contention as to the definition of a preposition...
 


Last sentence in the introduction of the "proposition" article : "Strawson advocated the use of the term "statement" (instead of proposition), and this is the current usage in mathematical logic."

Here.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top