I have empiracle evidence for life after death.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the conflict between Christian creationist beliefs, which assert that the Earth and Universe are only 6,000 to 10,000 years old, and the scientific understanding of the vast distances to stars, which are millions to billions of light-years away. Participants express a desire for empirical evidence to reconcile these views. One contributor introduces a geometric interpretation involving the concept of "0.5" to illustrate a relationship between action and reaction, referencing Newton's third law and drawing parallels to religious concepts involving Christ and God. The discussion also touches on the dimensions of morality and time, suggesting a symbolic interpretation of religious figures and dimensions, with time being equated to a negative force. Overall, the thread explores the intersection of scientific inquiry, religious belief, and philosophical reasoning, while emphasizing the need for clarity in the use of empirical evidence.
b11ngoo
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Originally posted by treat2
Christian creationists put the Earth's age and the age of the Universe between 6-10,000 years old, with 6,000 being the most popularly stated number.

The stars in the Universe (except for our Sun) are MILLIONS AND BILLIONS of LIGHT YEARS away from us. How we can possibly be able to either see or

just scientifically detect ANY stars?

Please explain how this obvious contradition is scientifically possible with reference to any empirical evidence.

- I postulate. The intersection/geometry must have .5 in it's empiracle evidence. Or 1/2. It follows action is followed by reaction.

Now since we want empiracle evidence. There it is.

1)
Now I apply Christ to this rule. Not God. Christ.

How many people are you ? 1. Christ says treat everybody like you. Like # 1.

Christ said his father verified him. His father is .5 and Christ is .5 So both are the same.

2)
Newton's third law has .5 in a form of it's empiracle evidence.

So Christ followed Newton's third law.
Since .5 is in empiracle evidence.

3)
- The intersection/geometry the Government had was action, and Christ's was reaction. Reason. Given.
- It follows that .5 = Action = Government = God the father. Reason. Christ's confession.
- So when the Government folds Christ. He still confesses God. Reason. Christs confession.
- There is a complementary and corresponding intersection/geometry in life. Reason.We all live and die. We all are healthy or unhealthy.
The complementary reaction of the living is we all laugh at unhealthy or healthy things. There's variety.
- Jesus experienced the negative complementary acute angle. Death. Reason. Given.
- Now the death is equal with life. Reason. Complementary acute angles are equal.
- So he just needed the right action and he would be positive or living again. Reason. Aliens. Cosmic aliens might know how to make acute angles equal under any

circumstance or state. The negative experience would be made positive again. "Dead man walks after sleeping for 3 Jewish days."Now that's news worthy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Once more, a postulate is not empirical evidence.

Please, please, PLEASE, make it a priority to find out what the word empirical means before the next time you use it again.
 
Originally posted by b11ngoo
- I postulate. The intersection/geometry must have .5 in it's empiracle evidence. Or 1/2. It follows action is followed by reaction.

Now since we want empiracle evidence. There it is.
?
 
Well now

Jesus sits at the right hand of the Father, so Jesus is east and the Father is north. And the Holy Ghost "descended like a dove" so the Holy Ghost is up. That's the three good, moral dimensions. But time, see, it comes "like a thief in the night." So time is Satan, and that's the fourth dimension.

It's all encoded in the diagonal elements of the metric tensor:

+ + + -

If you see an author using

- - - +

you know right off the bat that he is a Satanist.
 
Originally posted by b11ngoo
I postulate. The intersection/geometry must have .5 in it's empiracle evidence. Or 1/2. It follows action is followed by reaction.

I like your posts. They're ... silly ...
 
I posted a full statement. My statement was misunderstood. I understand the statement perceived to be different from what I posted.
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top