I interpreting my results for a thermal decomposition lab

AI Thread Summary
The experiment involved heating a flask with an unknown mixture of calcium sulfate dihydrate and NaCl to determine the percentage of NaCl. The observed percent error was 12%, which was consistent across the lab group. Factors contributing to this error may include incomplete removal of water from the hydrate or variations in the composition of hydrates due to environmental conditions. The accuracy of hydrate composition can be affected by temperature, humidity, and the sample's history. Understanding these variables is crucial for improving the reliability of results in thermal decomposition experiments.
littlebearrrr
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I performed an experiment recently, which required me to heat a flask and an unknown compound to constant weight. The unknown was supposed to be a mixture of calcium sulfate dihydrate and NaCl. My goal for this lab was to determine the % NaCl in the mixture. My percent error wasn't too bad: I got 12%. I'm just curious as to what could have contributed to this, especially since this error was consistent among the rest of my lab group. (Note: I was sure to completely transfer all of my compound to my flask). Does it have anything to do with the hydrate not being completely driven off?


Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


N/A
 
Physics news on Phys.org
littlebearrrr said:
unknown was supposed to be a mixture of calcium sulfate dihydrate

Composition of hydrates is often only approximate and depends on the temperature, humidity and sample history.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top