I just noticed that we tend to call EM wavelengths shorter than

  • Thread starter Thread starter jacket250
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Em Wavelengths
AI Thread Summary
Electromagnetic (EM) wavelengths shorter than visible light are referred to as "rays," while those longer are called "waves," primarily due to terminology rather than physical differences. The term "rays" emphasizes the straight-line propagation of light, which aligns with the principles of geometrical optics. In contrast, longer wavelengths like radio waves exhibit a spreading behavior, which is why they are termed "waves." The introduction of microwave frequencies, which are closer to visible light, has led to the adoption of line-of-sight concepts in radio communication. This distinction in terminology reflects the different propagation characteristics of EM radiation across the spectrum.
jacket250
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I just noticed that we tend to call EM wavelengths shorter than visible light "rays" while we call we call those that are longer "waves". Why is that? Did we ever think that "rays" and "waves" were physically different?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hello jacket 250 and welcome to Physics Forums.

Actually there is a difference, not between the infra and ultra EM, but between the terminology.

Perhaps you have heard the term 'line of sight'?
Well rays refer to this aspect of EM radiation. The idea that light travels in straight lines and that you can draw a straight line path between the source and observer. The whole of geometrical optics in fact.

Radio, on the other hand, 'spreads out' and transhorizon reception has long been used.
Only when we started using microwave frequencies, closer to those of light, did we start using line of sight radio.

go well
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top