I need a clearer picture of where I need to be

  • Thread starter Thread starter yaganon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Picture
AI Thread Summary
Iowa State University is recognized for its engineering program, but the discussion highlights concerns about a GPA of 3.3, which is expected to improve to around 3.6. The importance of GPA is emphasized, as it significantly impacts opportunities for research experiences, scholarships, and graduate school admissions. The challenges faced by international students in securing competitive positions are noted, particularly since many opportunities require a minimum GPA of 3.0, with more prestigious roles demanding higher GPAs. The conversation stresses the necessity of gaining relevant experiences, even if they are not ideal, to enhance resumes and build a foundation for future applications. Engaging in various activities, such as tutoring or research positions, is encouraged as a way to accumulate valuable experience and improve prospects for prestigious graduate programs.
yaganon
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I go to Iowa State University, which is a decent college for engineering, not great. My GPA is not good right now (3.3, about to be 3.6ish after finals next week). I will try to ace every single college class for my next 2.5-3 years in college. I will tackle heavy courseloads, and still work in a research lab, play ultimate frisbee, and join clubs if I have time.

Unfortunately, your GPA is Mandatory for basically everything from REUs, scholarships, to grad school. Judging by my GPA and the fact that I'm an international student, it's clear that I'm in no shape to apply for anything remotely competitive at this time. I'm tired of getting rejected. I want to really change my resume so that I can get the positions I want and the money I Need.

What can you tell me that will help me? Please be as specific as you like. Examples and stories would be great as well.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you looked at GE and the like? Last I checked, their internships required a 3.0
http://www.ge.com/careers/students/internships/index.html
And you don't even need to be a citizen, just authorized to work in the states.

Judging by my GPA and the fact that I'm an international student
It's mostly the international student thing that's killing you, as there's a lot out there that only requires a 3.0 and citizenship. The only ones I've seen that require 3.5 or 3.6 are insanely competitive for a host of reasons, but they also tend to be the most prestigious of the lot (not the most common.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's the thing. I want to go to a prestigious grad school. For that, I need legit experiences on my resume that no average joes can obtain.
 
yaganon said:
That's the thing. I want to go to a prestigious grad school. For that, I need legit experiences on my resume that no average joes can obtain.
Take what you can get and do brilliantly at it, as it's better than sitting around doing nothing 'cause you think you're too good for the positions you can actually get. Experience builds on itself and all that jazz, plus in the mean time you're making rent and building up your resume to apply to something shiny. Almost everybody I know who has gotten something shiny (be it a big competitive fellowship or admission to an ultra-shiny school) has done their time as a tutor/workshop leader/research lackey/etc.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Back
Top