I need a formula for Height equals length of arc.

AI Thread Summary
To determine the angle for a projectile so that its height equals the length of its arc, one must use the equations of motion to derive a relationship between height and distance traveled. The projectile's path is parabolic, and eliminating time from the equations yields a function of height in terms of distance. However, it is established that the height attained will never equal the arc length, with the maximum ratio occurring when the projectile is fired straight up, where height is half the arc length. In all other scenarios, the height will be an even smaller fraction of the arc length. Thus, achieving equal height and arc length is not possible.
SPiZ
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How do I find out what angle to fire a projectile so that the height it attains is equiv to the length of its arc? Whats a general formula? Assume the projectile is "fired" from ground level. Say, from a pea shooter or a sling shot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The projectile will travel in a parabola.

You use the eqns of motion to give eqns for movement in the x- and y-directions.
Eliminate t (time) from the two eqns to leave an eqn with y in terms of x, i.e. y=f(x) - which will be a parabola.

For the length of the curve look here.
 
Where would sin theta = cos theta? Wouldn't that give me the answer?
 
Wait a minute. I've just realized what you're asking for.
It's never going to happen

By "length of arc", you did mean the length of it's path, S, yes ?

If you look at the attachment, The height attained, h, will never be equal to S.
The nearest it comes is when the projectile is fired straight up vertically, in which case you wiil get h = (1/2)S.
In all other cases h will be an even smaller fraction.

Did you copy down the question correctly ?

Where is this question from ?
 

Attachments

  • spiz.jpg
    spiz.jpg
    11.3 KB · Views: 554
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top