I solved this Conservation of Energy problem but I don't fully understand how

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a conservation of energy problem involving kinetic energy (KE), gravitational potential energy (PE), and elastic potential energy from a spring. The user correctly applies the conservation of energy principle by equating the elastic potential energy of the spring to the sum of the kinetic and gravitational potential energies of the mass. The key point is that the mass gains energy solely from the elastic potential energy stored in the spring, which transforms into kinetic and potential energy as the mass moves. The method used is validated by the correct final velocity of 1.9 m/s. Understanding the physics behind this setup is crucial for grasping the conservation of energy in systems involving springs.
coldjeanz
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



6maut.png



Homework Equations



K.E = 1/2(m)(v final)^2
P.E = mgh
1/2k(x)^2 <--I don't understand how you would know to use this one


The Attempt at a Solution



Ok so I said that energy would be conserved so E initial would equal E final.

This is what I did to solve the problem but it was more luck than anything:

1/2k(x)^2 = 1/2(m)(v final)^2 + mgh

I solved for (v final) to get an answer of 1.9 m/s which is correct I think. But what I don't understand is why you are adding the potential and kinetic formulas together and then setting them equal to the 1/2k(x)^2 formula (what is this called, is it elastic?). What is the physics behind setting up the problem this way?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only way the mass can gain energy in this problem is from the stored elastic potential energy of the compressed spring.
This energy is converted into KE and PE of the mass.
Your answer is good, I got the same by your method
 
Alright that makes sense, thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top