I want to create an ultrasonic generator amplifier w/ MOSFET

AI Thread Summary
A beginner in electronics is seeking to amplify the output of their 100-watt, 40 kHz ultrasonic generator to enhance the amplitude of several ultrasonic transducers. They plan to build an amplifier circuit using both N and P channel MOSFETs, inspired by a video demonstrating this setup. The user is interested in applications such as a high-powered ultrasonic nebulizer and ultrasonic levitation. Concerns about safety and potential hearing damage from high levels of ultrasound were raised, with a recommendation to review relevant safety literature before proceeding with experiments. The thread is temporarily closed for moderation until safety concerns are addressed.
Strangeline
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Firstly, I'm only a beginner at electronics and most of my knowledge comes from googling things.

I have (several) ultrasonic transducers (100 watt 40 khz) i'd like to drive with my ultrasonic generator (100 watts 40 khz) but I'd like to up the amplitude of my transducers because I want the sound waves to be thick w/ pressure. I'm worried my ultrasonic generator might not produce enough power so I wanted to build an amplifier circuit for it after seeing this video



The guy used 12 n and p channel mosfets in parallel to amplify the signal of his transducer. I know when you connect two mosfets in parallel you raise the gate capacitance, but how does using both N and P channel mosfets fit into the circuit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Strangeline said:
Firstly, I'm only a beginner at electronics and most of my knowledge comes from googling things.

I have (several) ultrasonic transducers (100 watt 40 khz) i'd like to drive with my ultrasonic generator (100 watts 40 khz) but I'd like to up the amplitude of my transducers because I want the sound waves to be thick w/ pressure. I'm worried my ultrasonic generator might not produce enough power so I wanted to build an amplifier circuit for it after seeing this video



The guy used 12 n and p channel mosfets in parallel to amplify the signal of his transducer. I know when you connect two mosfets in parallel you raise the gate capacitance, but how does using both N and P channel mosfets fit into the circuit?


Wat'cha going to do with all that ultrasonic power?
 
berkeman said:
Wat'cha going to do with all that ultrasonic power?

1. hopefully not kill myself
2. I am trying to build a high-powered ultrasonic nebulizer
3. I'd also like to use my transducers to do some ultrasonic levitation with some really fine particles
 
So after watching this I realize composite transistors must have complementary parts (NP or PN)

which I believe means I can just pair up the pairs (NP)(NP)(NP)(NP)... as many times as I want as long as I have power source capable of feeding the gate capacitance

like the crude diagram below (pretend T1 or T2 corresponds to P or N channels respectively)
NPmosfets.png
 
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top