I want to learn special relativity. More details below

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around learning special relativity, including recommendations for textbooks, the necessary mathematical background, and the transition to general relativity. Participants share their experiences with various resources and express their preferences for accessible materials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses interest in learning special relativity and seeks recommendations for accessible books, indicating a preference for those with problem sets and answer keys.
  • Another participant notes that the first edition of "Spacetime Physics" contains solutions to problems, suggesting it might be a better choice.
  • Several participants discuss the prerequisites for studying general relativity, emphasizing the need for knowledge beyond just special relativity.
  • There is mention of the importance of multivariable calculus for understanding general relativity, with one participant indicating they are willing to learn it.
  • Some participants suggest "Exploring Black Holes" as a potential follow-up resource after "Spacetime Physics."
  • Concerns are raised about the level of calculus and multivariable calculus knowledge required for topics like warp drive physics, with varying opinions on how much prior knowledge is necessary.
  • One participant recommends starting with Taylor and Wheeler's book before moving on to more advanced texts like Schutz's, while another suggests Morin's book as an alternative for beginners.
  • There is a discussion about the appropriate sequence of learning mathematics and relativity, with suggestions to focus on high school math before tackling more advanced topics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best resources for learning special relativity and the necessary mathematical background. There is no consensus on a single path forward, as opinions vary on the order of study and the complexity of required mathematics.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that understanding general relativity requires a solid foundation in special relativity and additional mathematical concepts, but the specific requirements and pathways remain unresolved.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in learning special relativity, those seeking textbook recommendations, and learners looking to understand the mathematical prerequisites for advanced physics topics may find this discussion beneficial.

rgtr
Messages
90
Reaction score
8
I want to learn special relativity.I have read a tiny bit of 2nd edition of Spacetime Physics: Introduction to Special Relativity and am liking it. Is it a good book? I also want problems to solve. I tried Special Relativity: For the Enthusiastic Beginner but found it to difficult. Does anyone have any suggestions.Also my knowledge of physics is limited but I figure I can learn classical physics as I go along.I am open to reading any book. I just don't like books that give you questions that the book don't explain.
I would prefer a book I can access online for free.

The book Spacetime Physics: Introduction to Special Relativity, is the 1st addition or the 2nd addition better? Because I heard the 2nd addition is worse.Also if possible I would like the book to have answer key. I also want to learn general relativity but that is way down the line.
Thanks for any advice.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
From my limited knowledge in order to study general relativity you need more topics then just special relativity but after finishing the book will I have sufficiently covered the topic of special relativity for general relativity?
 
rgtr said:
From my limited knowledge in order to study general relativity you need more topics then just special relativity but after finishing the book will I have sufficiently covered the topic of special relativity for general relativity?
Have you studied multivariable calculus, including the multivariable chain rule?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
George Jones said:
Have you studied multivariable calculus, including the multivariable chain rule?
No but I can learn it.
 
rgtr said:
From my limited knowledge in order to study general relativity you need more topics then just special relativity but after finishing the book will I have sufficiently covered the topic of special relativity for general relativity?
Many GR books cover the necessary SR as well. Schutz, for example, does a really good job.

Bernard Schutz, A First Course in General Relativity, 2nd Edition

 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby
But don't I need to know calculus and multivariable calculus? Also how much knowledge of GR do I need to understand the field of warp drive physics? I find warp drives interesting.
 
Daverz said:
Many GR books cover the necessary SR as well. Schutz, for example, does a really good job.

Bernard Schutz, A First Course in General Relativity, 2nd Edition

I just made a new comment and forgot to hit reply.
 
  • #10
rgtr said:
But don't I need to know calculus and multivariable calculus? Also how much knowledge of GR do I need to understand the field of warp drive physics? I find warp drives interesting.

Yes, so I'd still try to hunt down the maroon paperback first edition of Spacetime Physics.

https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/Se...716703365&n=100121503&cm_sp=mbc-_-ISBN-_-used

(Not affiliated with abebooks. They are a good site to find exactly the edition you want.)

 
Last edited:
  • #11
I have a few questions that I will ask later but what feeds energy into the system to accelerate?
 
  • #12
rgtr said:
Also how much knowledge of GR do I need to understand the field of warp drive physics?
A lot. It is quite a few steps past Taylor and Wheeler.

Why not take the first step?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LCSphysicist
  • #13
rgtr said:
I have a few questions that I will ask later but what feeds energy into the system to accelerate?

feel free to ask…. But not here in this thread about textbooks. Start a new thread in the appropriate subforum.
 
  • #14
Vanadium 50 said:
A lot. It is quite a few steps past Taylor and Wheeler.

Why not take the first step?
Followup question should I learn the math first then tackle schultz's book or should I try wheeler book then learn the math for gr? Can someone list the math necessary to learn? I Just know high school algebra
 
  • #15
rgtr said:
I Just know high school algebra
You have about six years to go. You should start with Taylor and Wheeler. When you're finished with that, we can talk about the next steps.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and sysprog
  • #16
rgtr said:
Followup question should I learn the math first then tackle schultz's book or should I try wheeler book then learn the math for gr? Can someone list the math necessary to learn? I Just know high school algebra
As an alternative to Taylor & Wheeler, you could start with Morin's book, as the first chapter is free online:

https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/david-morin/files/relativity_chap_1.pdf

If you are serious and study a bit every day, I'd give yourself 4-6 weeks to understand the first chapter of Morin.

Schutz's book is graduate level, so that will be way too advanced for a first step.

Re mathematics, you only need high school maths for SR. GR is a different ball-game altogether. If you find you can't get through Morin because you don't understand the mathematics, then you'll have to revise high-school maths - in particular, algebra, trigonometry and differentiation.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hamiltonian, vanhees71 and sysprog

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K