I with 1 question. VERY PLEASE

  • Thread starter Thread starter STAR3URY
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the function f(x) given the relationship F[g(x)] = R(x). The original poster suggests that f(x) can be derived as f(x) = R(x)/g(x) based on the logic that division is the inverse of multiplication. However, participants clarify that the correct approach involves understanding function composition rather than simple division. They emphasize that the inverse function g^(-1)(x) should be used correctly in the context of substituting variables. Ultimately, the consensus is that the original poster's reasoning is valid, provided the substitution is applied correctly.
STAR3URY
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I need help with 1 question. VERY URGENT PLEASE!

Homework Statement


if F[g(x)] = R(x) where g(x) and r(x) is known find f(x).


Homework Equations


none


The Attempt at a Solution


I did it but i don't know if it is right:

(g^-1 of x) = x

so...

F(x) = r(g^-1 of x)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
f(x)=R(x)/g(x)
 
Numzie said:
f(x)=R(x)/g(x)


how did u get that?
 
Well I'm not 100% certain its that but I just used logic. Division is the inverse of multiplication so if f[g(x)]=R(x) then f(x)=R(x)/g(x). i.e. f[g(2)]=12 then f(x)=12/2. 12/2=6 and 6(2)=12
 
Numzie said:
Well I'm not 100% certain its that but I just used logic. Division is the inverse of multiplication so if f[g(x)]=R(x) then f(x)=R(x)/g(x). i.e. f[g(2)]=12 then f(x)=12/2. 12/2=6 and 6(2)=12

It's not multiplication. It's composition of functions. And assuming g is invertible then the OP is correct. Except don't say g^(-1)(x)=x. That's ridiculous. g(g^(-1)(x))=x.
 
Last edited:
Isn't the OP correct only if F(g) = g(F) and R(g) = g(R) ?
 
EnumaElish said:
Isn't the OP correct only if F(g) = g(F) and R(g) = g(R) ?

No. The OP is ok with the answer. What the OP means to say is substitute y=g(x), so x=g^(-1)(y). So F(y)=R(g^(-1)(y)). Now just replace the dummy y with x.
 
Back
Top