I wonder what the name of this normalization process is

td21
Gold Member
Messages
177
Reaction score
8
I wonder what the name of this normalization process is for better reference.

The scenario is like this:

$$\left|\Psi\right> = \frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}\left(\left|a\right>+\left|b\right>+\left|c\right>+\left|d\right>+\left|e\right>+\left|f\right>\right)$$
where each of the components inside the bracket is orthonormal to each other.

$$M$$ is an operator which is non-hermitian.
$$M\left|\Psi\right> = \frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}\left(\left|a'\right>+\left|b'\right>+\left|c'\right>+\left|d'\right>+\left|e'\right>+\left|f'\right>\right).$$

If $$\left|a'\right>=\left|d'\right>$$, $$\left|b'\right> = \left|e'\right>$$, $$\left|c'\right> = \left|f'\right>$$,

then $$H\left|\Psi\right> = \frac{2}{\sqrt{6}}\left(\left|a'\right>+\left|b'\right>+\left|c'\right>\right).$$

We have to normalize this new state. What is this normalization principle called in quantum mechanics or any textbook regarding this? Thank you very much.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know if it has a name but it simply comes from your non-hermitian operator, which as I understand it are only used as a mathematical convenience in quantum mechanics. What matters is that they have real eigenvalues so they can correspond to observables. The choice of normalization constant was arbitrary to begin with, since A*psi is a solution if psi is one, I don't think it matters very much... you can just accept it as a consequence of having non-orthogonal eigenvectors as a result of non-hermiticity and renormalize.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
490
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top