I wont to learn the logic behind a determinant

  • Thread starter Thread starter paul-martin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant Logic
paul-martin
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I won't to learn the logic behind a determinant, the math isn’t so hard you do that then you do that, you don’t need to think.

But if I gone solve dynamic problems, then I must understand how a determinate work. Why do I get the information I want when I take the determinant?

Do anyone got an link which can help me in this?

Kindly paul-Martin...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure that there is a "how" for the determinant's working. The determinant is defined to be the ratio of volume change of the unit n-cube. Do you mean why does it have the formula it does? Well, you could probably show that it were true geometrically, but that isn't very illuminating. If you know anything about exterior algebras, it can be derived from the fact that the n'th degree component of an n dimensional vector space's exterior algebra is 1 dimensional and the determinant is the induced image of the linear transformation on this component, but I don't know how useful that is to you. It is multiplicative and can be shown to be (essentially) unique and so on.

I don't see what this has to do with dynamics though.

Perhaps you could explain a little more what level you're at and what you mean by "how it works"
 
What do YOU mean by "the information I want"?
 
Well the problem i gott are something like this. (i have by accident wrote b instead of w)

http://img47.exs.cx/img47/4681/Determinant.jpg

Thx for any help given Paul-M.
 
I will confess I was bemused for a moment by "angel speed"! (Calculating how fast an angel can fly? Is that before or after dancing on the head of a pin? :smile: ) I think you meant "angular speed" but anyway, you are seeking a value of w so that the matrix equation Ax= 0 has a non-trivial solution (A depending on w).

The "logic" of the situation is this: If A has an inverse, then we could solve the equation Ax= 0 for the unique solution x= A-10= 0. That is, if A has an inverse, then the equation has only the trivial solution. In order to have a non-trivial solution, A must not have an inverse.
A matrix has an inverse if and only if its determinant is not 0 and so does not have an inverse if and only if its determinant is 0. The equation Ax= 0 has a non-trivial solution if and only if det(A)= 0. You correctly set det(A)= 0 and correctly solved for w.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top