I would just like to confirm these homework question answers

  • Thread starter Thread starter chance master
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homework
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concepts of force equilibrium and Newton's laws. It confirms that three equal forces cannot be arranged to cancel each other out, resulting in a net force of zero, which is marked as false. Additionally, it states that three unequal forces cannot cancel each other out, leading to a net force, also marked as false. The third statement, asserting that a single force cannot act on an object alone, is true, highlighting the importance of action-reaction pairs. The conversation emphasizes the need to visualize forces through diagrams, particularly using the concept of an equilateral triangle for clarity.
chance master
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Member warned to use the formatting template and choose descriptive thread titles.
True or False:
If three forces, all of equal magnitude, act on a single object can these forces be arranged to cancel out, so that the object is in equilibrium? (F)

If three forces, all of unequal magnitude with the other two, act on a single object, it is never possible for these
three forces to cancel, so we can deduce that there will be a net force on the object.(F)

According to Newton's 3rd Law, it is never possible for a single force to act on a single object.(T)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd like to hear your reasoning for your answer to number 1.
 
I figure that no matter which way you organize 3 forces of equal calibre(let's say 600N), you can never balance the 3 forces so that there would be a net force of zero on the object. I tried making a force diagram but I still came to the same conclusion.
 
chance master said:
I figure that no matter which way you organize 3 forces of equal calibre(let's say 600N), you can never balance the 3 forces so that there would be a net force of zero on the object. I tried making a force diagram but I still came to the same conclusion.
Do you understand the concept of an equilateral triangle?
 
  • Like
Likes CWatters
For the third one, consider pulling a cart with a rope and examine the point of contact
of the rope with the cart (draw the force arrows) and see if you still arrive at the
same conclusion.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top