Chemistry Idea for a molecular biology-based, laboratory research plan

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a request for an original molecular biology research plan for a fourth-year undergraduate project. The poster seeks guidance on developing a project that includes a background/literature review and proposed research design, without conducting actual experiments. Respondents emphasize the importance of originality and suggest that the poster should share specific interests to refine a project idea. The conversation highlights the need for personal engagement in the research planning process. Ultimately, the focus is on collaborative brainstorming to inspire a unique project concept.
makaveli416
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey!

This is for a 4th year undergrad project in Applied Molec Bio.

I need an idea for a molecular biology-based, laboratory research plan.

It needs to be an "original" idea but I'm having trouble of picking one... I will not actually be performing any experiments.

It will contain the following sections:

1) Background/Literature Review
2) Proposed Research Design and Methodology

Anyone have any ideas?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We can't just hand you a project idea, it needs to be your own. But, perhaps we can help you refine one if you tell us something about the topics that might interest you.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top