Ideality factor - schotkky diode

  • Thread starter hananl
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Diode
In summary: Basically, n is just a factor that is added to the ideal equation to account for the inclusion of second order effects. n is found experimentally via curve fitting and is usually pretty close to one.
  • #1
hananl
23
0
Hi,
everywhere I look for the equation describing the current of a diode, I get
I=I0exp(qvb/nkt-1)

n=1 for ideal case. for non-ideal diode you got values between 1-2.

in order to calculate n you have the equation: n=1+kt/(2*q*phi)
(phi=contact barrier height)

anyone knows how to derive this equation for n?

thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
http://ece-www.colorado.edu/~bart/book/book/chapter4/ch4_4.htm

See section 4.4.4.

n is just something that is added there because we recognize the equations we use to model a pn junction (see everything before section 4.4.4) are not perfect, there are important second order effects. Adding a fudge factor is an easy way to increase the accuracy of the model. Of course you don't have to do that. There are equations to express the additional effects, but engineers rarely need that kind of accuracy so we don't bother.

AFAIK, n is always found experimentally via curve fitting and it is usually pretty close to one. The diodes I am using now, for example, have n=1.08. BJTs wired as diodes can have n quite small, say less than 1.01. Diodes inside ASICs typically have larger n's due to dimensions and smaller currents.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Hi,
I know that there are deviations from the ideal model, also I undestand why (due to generation-recombination currents). So I can understand why for certain materil its n value is bigger(smaller) than another semiconductor.
But I DO need to know how get this equation. infact I need to prove it since I am making a lab report, and need to show this relation but don't know how to approch it.
thanks.
 
  • #4
Well, section 4.4.2 in the above link derives the ideal equation based on quasi-fermi energies (see section 2.11.5). Then just say this equation I derived is missing second order effects so I am slapping in a constant factor in the exponential to account for it.

I am not sure how you are supposed to "prove" it (especially when we know it's wrong) via experiment since the whole point is to fit the equation to the data not vice versa. Maybe solve for one diode and then use it to predict the current of a set of diodes?

Proofs are for math class, not engineering. :)
 
Last edited:
  • #5
I also understand non-ideality factors to be empirical corrections. You can look in Henisch, Semiconductor Contacts (1984) for a discussion relating to Schottky barriers. He discusses tunneling and other effects, and gives numerous references for further reading.
Edit: He is careful to point out that it is purely empirical in nature.
 
  • #6
es1,
It seems resonable to add a constant, so I don't understand how I was told that:
n=1+kt/(2*q*phi) ... ?
 
  • #7
I am not sure either.

My guess is it's based on the assumption that the error is exclusively based on the recombination current which is dominated by the electron-hole pairs with the minimum amount of energy necessary to recombine. The barrier height is q(phi-vb) so if they meet in the middle the energy is half that. So then the left side of the equation becomes I multiplied by some error term which is portional to e^(-(phi-vb)/2Vt). Then make an assumption about I for a given vb and solve for n.

Just a guess based on reverse engineering your equation for n. Also, I didn't plug it in so the math might not work out in the end.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Hi,
I let it go, but anyhow, if you are interested:
take the term for Js, the current for schottky diode:
http://ece-www.colorado.edu/~bart/book/book/chapter3/ch3_4.htm section 3.4.1 the first equation. we would like to have something like
J=J'*exp(qvb/kt-1)
However, if we take J' as the part in section 3.4.1 that's only before the exp, that's not good, since we have a depndace on Va (the voltage we apply on the jucntion) and we would like to have J'=const. so that's where n came from. we assum Va<<phi. also we use : x^0.5=exp^(0.5lnx)
we assume j'=the whole part before the exp, excluding the Va. using this ln "trick", and presenting ln with a taylor seriouse, my instructor told me, than eventually you get n=1+kt/(2q*phi). than you'll have: J=J'exp(qvb/nkt -1).

thanks es1.

Hananl
 
Last edited:

What is the ideality factor of a Schottky diode?

The ideality factor, also known as the diode quality factor, is a measure of how closely a diode follows the ideal diode equation. It takes into account factors such as recombination and non-ideal junction behavior.

How is the ideality factor determined?

The ideality factor can be determined experimentally by measuring the forward bias current and voltage of a diode and plotting it on a logarithmic scale. The slope of the resulting curve is equal to the ideality factor.

What factors affect the ideality factor of a Schottky diode?

The ideality factor can be affected by temperature, electric field, and the material properties of the diode, such as the doping concentration and barrier height.

Why is the ideality factor important in Schottky diodes?

The ideality factor affects the accuracy of diode-based circuits and can also provide insight into the quality and performance of the diode. A lower ideality factor indicates a higher quality diode with fewer defects and a closer adherence to the ideal diode equation.

How can the ideality factor of a Schottky diode be improved?

The ideality factor can be improved by optimizing the material properties of the diode, such as the doping concentration and barrier height, and by minimizing defects during the manufacturing process. Additionally, controlling the temperature and electric field can also help improve the ideality factor.

Similar threads

  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • Electrical Engineering
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
989
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
270
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
661
Back
Top