- #1
- 259
- 2
1. In griffiths the following is written down in the chapter of identical particles:
##\Psi(\vec{r_{1}},\vec{r_{2}})=\pm \Psi(\vec{r_{2}},\vec{r_{2}})##
Where it's + for bosons and - for fermions.
However in class we have seen that for two electrons in the spin singlet situation the POSITION part of their wavefunction doesn't change signs upon swapping the particles. It's the spin part that changes sign in that case.
How to concile these two results? Does Griffiths take spin into account when writing the mentioned identity above? Because at least it looks like he means the position parts of the wavefunctions at first glance.
##\Psi(\vec{r_{1}},\vec{r_{2}})=\pm \Psi(\vec{r_{2}},\vec{r_{2}})##
Where it's + for bosons and - for fermions.
However in class we have seen that for two electrons in the spin singlet situation the POSITION part of their wavefunction doesn't change signs upon swapping the particles. It's the spin part that changes sign in that case.
How to concile these two results? Does Griffiths take spin into account when writing the mentioned identity above? Because at least it looks like he means the position parts of the wavefunctions at first glance.