Idential particles, postion wavefunction for fermions.

  • Thread starter Coffee_
  • Start date
  • #1
259
2
1. In griffiths the following is written down in the chapter of identical particles:

##\Psi(\vec{r_{1}},\vec{r_{2}})=\pm \Psi(\vec{r_{2}},\vec{r_{2}})##

Where it's + for bosons and - for fermions.

However in class we have seen that for two electrons in the spin singlet situation the POSITION part of their wavefunction doesn't change signs upon swapping the particles. It's the spin part that changes sign in that case.

How to concile these two results? Does Griffiths take spin into account when writing the mentioned identity above? Because at least it looks like he means the position parts of the wavefunctions at first glance.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
TSny
Homework Helper
Gold Member
12,962
3,316
Check to see if Griffiths is ignoring spin at this point of the text. In the first edition, he says at the beginning of the chapter, "we'll ignore spin for the moment". Quite a bit later in the chapter, he brings in spin.
 
  • #3
259
2
Check to see if Griffiths is ignoring spin at this point of the text. In the first edition, he says at the beginning of the chapter, "we'll ignore spin for the moment". Quite a bit later in the chapter, he brings in spin.
Oh yes, you are entirely correct. I should have searched a bit longer in the book before posting. Thanks.
 

Related Threads on Idential particles, postion wavefunction for fermions.

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
676
Top