Identify process in a heat engine

AI Thread Summary
The heat engine problem involves a process from state a to state b, characterized by decreasing pressure and increasing volume and temperature, represented by a straight line on a volume vs. pressure graph. The discussion clarifies that this cannot be an adiabatic process due to the temperature increase and the nature of the transformations involved. Participants suggest that the process may not fit standard categories like isochoric, isobaric, or isothermal, indicating it could be a composite transformation. The conclusion is that the transformation lacks a specific name but can be analyzed using the ideal gas law, allowing calculations for work and heat transfer. The consensus is that understanding the transformation's general characteristics is essential for solving the problem.
physics.stu
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm taking a practice test and I need some help with a heat engine problem.
There are three parts, the one that's giving me trouble is a-->b. The Volume v. Pressure graph shows a straight line. Pa= 5 atm Va= 5 L Ta=300K and Tb=800K are given.
So pressure is decreaseing, while volume and temperature are increasing. What type of process is this? How could I find Pb or Vb?

Homework Equations



For an adiabatic process:
PaVa^(5/3)=PbVb^(5/3)=constant
TaVa^(2/3)=TbVb^(2/3)=constant
W=-dU(internal energy)=-(3/2)RTln(Vb/Va)

The Attempt at a Solution


I initially thought this was adiabatic expansion but that cannot be true because of the temperature increase (as far as my limited knowledge can tell). All my calculations yield nonsense answers so I really do not think it could be adiabatic; but I may be wrong of course. Other than that I have no idea
 
Physics news on Phys.org
physics.stu said:
I initially thought this was adiabatic expansion but that cannot be true because of the temperature increase (as far as my limited knowledge can tell). All my calculations yield nonsense answers so I really do not think it could be adiabatic; but I may be wrong of course. Other than that I have no idea

In an adiabatic process, temperature DO change: the adiabatic process is the one in which there is no heat exchange with the outside, but temperature will change.

This said, you're right, it can't be an adiabatic process anyway, because i) if pressure decreases and volume increases, then temperature would decrease in an adiabatic process, and also ii) it is not represented with a straight line, but with a curve...

A straight line with both pressure and volume increasing sounds as no elementary transformation to me (it is neither an isochoric transf. nor an isobaric one). Also isothermal would have constant temperature so nothing to do. The only chance I see is to use a composite transformation. You could try seeing if you can connect the starting and arriving point with an isothermal and an adiabatic transformation, but the simplest way should be to use an isochoric and an isobaric.

In practice you can try to reach the final pressure with constant volume and then leave the same pressure and vary volume to reach also final volume. This is the only way I can think of anyway.
 
Can you use the information of b-->c to figure out the conditions at b?
 
I found that Pa= 10Pc so I was able to find Vc and b-->c is isovolumetric so Vc=Vb. The only question remaining is what type of process could this be?!
Thank you all for your replies. It's not isobaric/choric because both pressure and volume are changing. I'm glad you all agree that it can't be adiabatic. Maybe a-->b isn't a process that has any sort of special characteristics other than the ideal gas law. I should be able to find W and Q from other equations.
 
I am not aware of any special name for a transformation which is not isobaric/choric and is straight at the same time... then it has to be a general transformation for a perfect gas, and that's all
 
I think you're right Tia. I used W=PdV and dU=Q-W to find W and Q. Thanks for your help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top