Identifying Inconsistent Systems of Linear Equations with Gaussian Elimination

AI Thread Summary
Inconsistent systems of linear equations can be identified during Gaussian Elimination when the row reduction process leads to a row that indicates a contradiction, such as 0 = c, where c is a non-zero constant. To create your own inconsistent sets, ensure that the equations represent parallel lines or planes that do not intersect, such as x + y = 1 and x + y = 2. During the elimination process, these equations will result in a row that shows inconsistency. Understanding pivoting and the lack of a solution is crucial when formulating these sets. Overall, recognizing the signs of inconsistency in Gaussian Elimination is key to mastering this topic.
Muzly
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Any help on this one would be greatly appreciated. Due to that I can't find much of a connection (due to lack of inconsistent set of linear equations), and the fact that I'm unable to explain it properly, can someone please help me?

Here's the question:

If a system of linear equations is inconsistent, and Gaussian Elimination is applied to the augmented matrix, what will occur during the row reduction process that will indicate the inconsistency? Explain briefly.

Thanks a bunch guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could always invent your own inconsistent sets of linear equations.
 
Where do I begin on that?

What should I take into account when creating my own inconsistent sets?
 
pivoting! lack of solution?
 
Muzly said:
Where do I begin on that?

What should I take into account when creating my own inconsistent sets?

For example:

x+y=1
x+y=2

Are these equations consistent? What do you get by Gauss elimination?

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top