Identities for atan(a+b) or atan(a*b)

  • Thread starter Thread starter rhz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    identities
AI Thread Summary
There are no well-known identities for the inverse tangent of a sum or product, unlike the established identities for regular trigonometric functions. The discussion highlights the lack of expansions for inverse trigonometric functions, specifically for atan(a+b) or atan(a*b). The original poster expresses frustration over the difficulty in finding useful information online. The inquiry remains open for any potential applications or needs for such identities. Overall, the consensus is that these identities are not readily available or established in mathematical literature.
rhz
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Does anyone know of any nice identities for the inverse or arc tangent of a sum or a product?

Thanks,

rhz
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
bump...

Any ideas out there? I searched for this on google and came up with nothing.

Thanks!
 
I don't believe there are any nice expansions for the sum or product of inverse trigs, such as how there are for trigs. What do you need them for exactly?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top