If a 10km Asteroid Impacted the Pacific along the equator

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dav333
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Asteroid Equator
AI Thread Summary
A 10km asteroid impact in the Pacific between Hawaii and French Polynesia would create a massive explosion, potentially lighting up the sky like a second sun. The resulting tsunami could reach heights of around 50 meters, depending on various factors, and would likely inundate coastal areas in LA and Sydney. Material ejected into the atmosphere would differ from a land impact, possibly resulting in less debris reaching distant shores. The shockwave from the impact would likely be felt globally, causing tremors even on the opposite side of the planet. Overall, the catastrophic effects would be unprecedented, with significant destruction expected along coastlines.
Dav333
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
Say between Hawaii & French Polonesia.

What would it look like standing on the beach in LA or Sydney? Can anyone give detailed description?

Like would the sky out on the ocean front light up like a second sun?
What kind of a wave? How far inland would it reach?
Would it be followed by tremendous blast front of material rocks etc? If the material reached that far.

In terms of material being launched into the atmosphere, would the impact be much less then if impacted on land?

Would you feel the Earth shake a bit on the far side of the planet?

All of got to go on is Hollywood films.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A calculator for astoroid impact effects is here:

http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/impacteffects/"

There's nothing about tidal waves. A very rough guess for the height would be

(ocean depth) * (radius of hole in the water) / (distance from impact)

for an asteroid which is large enough to hit the bottom, which a 10 km is, since it will make a large crater in the ocean bottom.

This could be 5 km * 50 km / 5000 km = 50 m for a mid pacific strike. Tsunami's produced by earthquakes, and the tidal waves produced by the moon can become much higher when striking the coast, and I've no idea how that will work out here.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks. I simulated a rare 500km impact & seems no where on Earth was safe, the whole surface was like hell.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top