If a + b + c = abc, prove that at least one of (a,b,c) is < or = sqrt(3)

  • Thread starter Thread starter maverick280857
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that for three non-zero real numbers a, b, and c satisfying the equation a + b + c = abc, at least one of these numbers must be less than or equal to the square root of 3. A trigonometric approach is introduced, where a, b, and c are expressed as tangents of angles in a triangle, leading to the conclusion that if any angle exceeds π/3, at least one of the other angles must be less than π/3. An alternative proof using the arithmetic mean/geometric mean inequality is suggested, which leads to a contradiction if all modified variables are positive. The discussion highlights the interplay between different mathematical methods to arrive at the same conclusion. The conversation concludes with participants expressing understanding and appreciation for the various approaches presented.
maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5
Hi

Here's a question...

Let a, b, c be three non-zero real numbers such that

a + b + c = abc

Prove that at least one of these three numbers (a, b or c) is less than or equal to the square root of 3.


Can you prove this without trigonometry? The trigonometric solution follows...

Solution (using Trigonometry)

Let a = tan(A), b = tan(B), c = tan(C) (for some nonzero angles A, B, C which are real) so that the given constraint becomes

tan(A) + tan(B) + tan(C) = tan(A)tan(B)tan(C)

which can be true iff A + B + C = n*pie (n is an integer)

If n = 1, then A, B, C are the angles of a triangle (as the constraint is true for angles of a triangle). The result follows by considering cases: of an equilateral triangle where A = B = C = pie/3 radians so that each of a, b and c is equal to sqrt(3); next consider the case of a scalene triangle where A, B and C are all distinct. If A > pie/3, then B+C = pie-A = pie-(qty less than pie/3) and so either B or C is less than pie/3.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cheers
Vivek
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
i) a=b=c=\sqrt{3} is a solution of the equation
ii) Setting a=\sqrt{3}+\hat{a} and similarly for b and c

The proof follows readily from this
(i.e., at least one of the hatted numbers must be non-positive.)
 
Last edited:
Hi

Thanks. Your method is interesting...we get a new constraint on the hatted numbers now...am I right? (I haven't completed the solution using your substitutions..)

Cheers
Vivek
 
proof without using trig or substitution: use the arithmetic mean/geometric mean inequality
 
maverick280857 said:
Hi

Thanks. Your method is interesting...we get a new constraint on the hatted numbers now...am I right? (I haven't completed the solution using your substitutions..)

Cheers
Vivek

Yes, you end up with an equation which can be written like

f(\hat{a},\hat{b},\hat{c}) = -g(\hat{a},\hat{b},\hat{c})

And you'll find that for positive values of \hat{a},\hat{b},\hat{c}, the functions f and g must give positive numbers. So you have LHS = positive number and RHS = negative number...a contradiction ! So, one of \hat{a},\hat{b},\hat{c} must not be positive.
 
Last edited:
Thanks Gokul43201

I get it now :-D

Cheers
Vivek
 
I don't =[
 
Back
Top