If all states are stationary, what causes atoms to radiate then?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raziel2701
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms States
Raziel2701
Messages
128
Reaction score
0
We've solved for several systems, the hydrogen atom for instance, and one of the properties of these is that it doesn't matter what excitation state you look at, they are stationary states, the Hamiltonian is constant in time, so where's the impetus on an excited atom to radiate light if it's in a stationary state?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The stationary states you solved for are for the hydrogen Hamiltonian only. If you included the vacuum EM field, then they would not be stationary states. All "spontaneous emissions" are the result of stimulated emissions except with the vacuum EM field.
 
So, what is this vacuum EM field? How does it trigger emission of light in the atom?
 
So, what is this vacuum EM field?
Include the electromagnetic field by adding the term ½(E2 + B2) to the Hamiltonian. Initially the EM field is in the vacuum state (no photons).
How does it trigger emission of light in the atom?
Add the interaction terms to the Hamiltonian:

(1/2m)(p - eA)2 + eφ

These terms have nonzero off-diagonal matrix elements which induce the transition between the excited state ψ1 and the ground state ψ0
 
Then I wonder, why usually an atom is in an eigenstate of H_atom, instead of an eigenstate of the full QED hamiltonian?
 
I always thought it was because the superposition of states was non-stationary, so if you had an ensemble of atoms with a given energy distribution, the possibility that anyone could be in any of a multitude of excited states is what causes the superposition, and hence non-stationary state
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top